*/
ON 2 February 2010, the influential House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC) published a damning report on the Legal Services Commission’s handling of legal aid reform. The report on criminal legal aid procurement also warns that the increased use of solicitors to conduct work in the Crown Court is threatening the long-term future of the junior criminal Bar and may be affecting the quality of advocacy provided in those courts. The procurement of legal aid in England and Wales by the Legal Services Commission (HC 322) echoes many of the deeply held concerns of the Bar Council.
It criticises the LSC for ‘poor financial management and internal controls and deficient management information’. It says the Commission does not know whether its reforms are working or what they are doing to the sustainability of providers.
The Committee also says the implementation of the 2006 report on legal aid by Lord Carter of Coles has been delayed and reflects a lack of clear strategic direction at the LSC. The Committee complains of ‘confusion and uncertainty’ in the respective roles of theCommission and the Ministry of Justice, leading to duplication of effort and lack of clarity over who does what.
Commenting on the report, Bar Chairman Nicholas Green QC said:
‘What the PAC has found is what we have long feared. The reform of legal aid is in a chaotic state and is being conducted in a way which threatens the junior Bar, who are the lifeblood of the profession. It is galling, to say the least, for the Bar to witness such very damaging financial mismanagement, resulting even in the LSC’s 2008-09 accounts being qualified by the Comptroller and Auditor General, at a time when brutal cuts in legal aid will threaten the quality of representation in the Courts, as the Committee warns.’ Paul Mendelle QC, Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association, added: ‘After years of training, young barristers enter the profession burdened by debts running into tens, often scores, of thousands of pounds. They work extremely long hours and earn modest incomes, out of which they have to pay all their own expenses, for many years. Cuts like these will hurt the junior bar most and will force
many to give up publicly funded work.
Without a thriving junior Bar, there will be no barristers in the future, and the role of the self-employed advocate, which is fundamental to the proper working of the criminal justice system, will be lost.
At a time when public concern over the need properly and fairly to try crimes is as high as ever, to undermine the justice system through policy mismanagement and unreasonable cuts is reckless and irresponsible.
The profession’s efforts to maintain its diversity are being undermined by a legal aid system which seems to be in a perpetual state of near-crisis. The Public Accounts Committee’s report shows that this cannot go on any longer without causing lasting damage to the criminal justice system.’
The Committee also says the implementation of the 2006 report on legal aid by Lord Carter of Coles has been delayed and reflects a lack of clear strategic direction at the LSC. The Committee complains of ‘confusion and uncertainty’ in the respective roles of theCommission and the Ministry of Justice, leading to duplication of effort and lack of clarity over who does what.
Commenting on the report, Bar Chairman Nicholas Green QC said:
‘What the PAC has found is what we have long feared. The reform of legal aid is in a chaotic state and is being conducted in a way which threatens the junior Bar, who are the lifeblood of the profession. It is galling, to say the least, for the Bar to witness such very damaging financial mismanagement, resulting even in the LSC’s 2008-09 accounts being qualified by the Comptroller and Auditor General, at a time when brutal cuts in legal aid will threaten the quality of representation in the Courts, as the Committee warns.’ Paul Mendelle QC, Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association, added: ‘After years of training, young barristers enter the profession burdened by debts running into tens, often scores, of thousands of pounds. They work extremely long hours and earn modest incomes, out of which they have to pay all their own expenses, for many years. Cuts like these will hurt the junior bar most and will force
many to give up publicly funded work.
Without a thriving junior Bar, there will be no barristers in the future, and the role of the self-employed advocate, which is fundamental to the proper working of the criminal justice system, will be lost.
At a time when public concern over the need properly and fairly to try crimes is as high as ever, to undermine the justice system through policy mismanagement and unreasonable cuts is reckless and irresponsible.
The profession’s efforts to maintain its diversity are being undermined by a legal aid system which seems to be in a perpetual state of near-crisis. The Public Accounts Committee’s report shows that this cannot go on any longer without causing lasting damage to the criminal justice system.’
ON 2 February 2010, the influential House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC) published a damning report on the Legal Services Commission’s handling of legal aid reform. The report on criminal legal aid procurement also warns that the increased use of solicitors to conduct work in the Crown Court is threatening the long-term future of the junior criminal Bar and may be affecting the quality of advocacy provided in those courts. The procurement of legal aid in England and Wales by the Legal Services Commission (HC 322) echoes many of the deeply held concerns of the Bar Council.
It criticises the LSC for ‘poor financial management and internal controls and deficient management information’. It says the Commission does not know whether its reforms are working or what they are doing to the sustainability of providers.
Chair of the Bar finds common ground on legal services between our two jurisdictions, plus an update on jury trials
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Ever wondered what a pupillage is like at the CPS? This Q and A provides an insight into the training, experience and next steps
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today
