*/
As an Irish pupil barrister, St Patrick’s Day was an auspicious day to start second six. After 20 weeks of in-house advocacy training, six months of outstanding supervision, countless days shadowing members of Chambers in courts across the country and surviving the pupil mock trial, what could possibly go wrong?
Yet on the way to my first court appearance, I was worried about doing it all ‘wrong’. Later, my co-pupils (Gabriel, Katie and Jon) admitted feeling the same. That was reinforced a few months later at an imposter syndrome workshop at Chambers, where attendees agreed that feeling fear is normal! Here are four things I found helpful to feel the fear and advocate anyway as a new pupil.
I am one of four co-pupils in Chambers. During first six, we had weekly advocacy sessions covering everything from bail and bad character applications to closing speeches and pleas in mitigation. Over 20 weeks, our trainers created a culture where we were encouraged to perform our best advocacy but also to ask questions and experiment with different styles and approaches. Being comfortable trying new things and making mistakes improved the quality of everyone’s advocacy and we all celebrated when submissions found favour or commiserated when a point didn’t land.
In second six, my co-pupils’ advice and support continues to be generously shared and enormously welcomed. We share resources and meet up after court to share the highs and lows. Members of Chambers are always happy to help and all four of us are grateful and regular recipients of live remote-court-assistance via WhatsApp from those who have gone before us.
Week by week in advocacy training, we worked towards making more good and fewer bad points. There were times when the notion of running a full trial felt terrifying. Now, six months in, we all regularly prosecute and defend trials.
Like any skill, advocacy improves with practice. Our trainers openly shared tips for developing our skills but agreed that there is no substitute for practice. The learning curve is undoubtedly steep and every week has peaks and troughs. But before long, you’ll have moments where you realise how much progress you’ve made and a last-minute application or first appearance will be routine.
If you’ve read Adam Kay’s This is Going to Hurt, you may recognise his description of junior doctor training as ‘see one, do one, teach one’. Thankfully, no one expects pupils to teach anyone anything – but watching before doing in court can help settle nerves.
In every training session, we learned both from our trainers and from each other. Be reassured that you’re learning more than you think by watching others. I pick up new turns of phrase and arguments every time I’m in court and when I can, I sit in before my case is called on to watch others advocate and get a sense of the judge’s style and approach. I found that very helpful especially in those early weeks when everything was so new.
One of the best things about our training was its emphasis on individuality. No single model of advocacy was imposed on us. Our trainers often shared what their different approaches would have been in the same scenarios. Watching each other on our feet during the final mock trial illustrated just how effective our different advocacy styles were.
When we began second six, our lead advocacy trainer Ali Bajwa KC sent us a good luck message, encouraging us to ‘be liberated from the formality of training, and do it as yourselves’. That message stuck with me and I hope it helps you too.
Good luck in these first few months of pupillage – you’ve got this!
Nora Nanayakkara is a pupil at QEB Hollis Whiteman, with a background in professional regulation and corporate governance. She prosecutes and defends and is developing a general criminal practice.
As an Irish pupil barrister, St Patrick’s Day was an auspicious day to start second six. After 20 weeks of in-house advocacy training, six months of outstanding supervision, countless days shadowing members of Chambers in courts across the country and surviving the pupil mock trial, what could possibly go wrong?
Yet on the way to my first court appearance, I was worried about doing it all ‘wrong’. Later, my co-pupils (Gabriel, Katie and Jon) admitted feeling the same. That was reinforced a few months later at an imposter syndrome workshop at Chambers, where attendees agreed that feeling fear is normal! Here are four things I found helpful to feel the fear and advocate anyway as a new pupil.
I am one of four co-pupils in Chambers. During first six, we had weekly advocacy sessions covering everything from bail and bad character applications to closing speeches and pleas in mitigation. Over 20 weeks, our trainers created a culture where we were encouraged to perform our best advocacy but also to ask questions and experiment with different styles and approaches. Being comfortable trying new things and making mistakes improved the quality of everyone’s advocacy and we all celebrated when submissions found favour or commiserated when a point didn’t land.
In second six, my co-pupils’ advice and support continues to be generously shared and enormously welcomed. We share resources and meet up after court to share the highs and lows. Members of Chambers are always happy to help and all four of us are grateful and regular recipients of live remote-court-assistance via WhatsApp from those who have gone before us.
Week by week in advocacy training, we worked towards making more good and fewer bad points. There were times when the notion of running a full trial felt terrifying. Now, six months in, we all regularly prosecute and defend trials.
Like any skill, advocacy improves with practice. Our trainers openly shared tips for developing our skills but agreed that there is no substitute for practice. The learning curve is undoubtedly steep and every week has peaks and troughs. But before long, you’ll have moments where you realise how much progress you’ve made and a last-minute application or first appearance will be routine.
If you’ve read Adam Kay’s This is Going to Hurt, you may recognise his description of junior doctor training as ‘see one, do one, teach one’. Thankfully, no one expects pupils to teach anyone anything – but watching before doing in court can help settle nerves.
In every training session, we learned both from our trainers and from each other. Be reassured that you’re learning more than you think by watching others. I pick up new turns of phrase and arguments every time I’m in court and when I can, I sit in before my case is called on to watch others advocate and get a sense of the judge’s style and approach. I found that very helpful especially in those early weeks when everything was so new.
One of the best things about our training was its emphasis on individuality. No single model of advocacy was imposed on us. Our trainers often shared what their different approaches would have been in the same scenarios. Watching each other on our feet during the final mock trial illustrated just how effective our different advocacy styles were.
When we began second six, our lead advocacy trainer Ali Bajwa KC sent us a good luck message, encouraging us to ‘be liberated from the formality of training, and do it as yourselves’. That message stuck with me and I hope it helps you too.
Good luck in these first few months of pupillage – you’ve got this!
The Bar Council continues to call for investment for the justice system and represent the interests of our profession both at home and abroad
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Q&A with Tim Lynch of Jordan Lynch Private Finance
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Six months of court observation at the Old Bailey: APPEAL’s Dr Nisha Waller and Tehreem Sultan report their findings on prosecution practices under joint enterprise
The Amazonian artist’s first international solo exhibition is wholly relevant to current issues in social and environmental justice, says Stephen Cragg KC
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum disorder remains poorly understood in the criminal justice system. Does Alex Henry’s joint enterprise conviction expose the need to audit prisons? asks Dr Felicity Gerry KC
It’s been five years since the groundbreaking QC competition in which six Black women barristers, including the 2025 Chair of the Bar, took silk. Yet today, the number of Black KCs remains ‘critically low’. Desirée Artesi talks to Baroness Scotland KC, Allison Munroe KC and Melanie Simpson KC about the critical success factors, barriers and ideas for embedding change
