*/
Gisli Gudjonsson has enjoyed a most remarkable career. He is the world’s foremost expert on the science of false confessions, has given evidence on the subject in numerous landmark cases both in the UK and other jurisdictions and has been responsible for the development of the law in this field, as reflected in the many revisions of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 Codes of Practice, in which he had such a significant hand. His work is invariably cited in forensic psychological reports which address issues concerning fitness to plead and susceptibility to false confession.
The book is partly autobiographical and catalogues Gisli’s personal history and his involvement in various notorious cases – the ‘Birmingham Six’, the ‘Guildford Four’, the ‘Tottenham Three’ (Raghip), Judith Ward, Pendleton, the ‘Cardiff Three’ (Miller) and many others. He summarises the gestation and fruition of the science and law which now reduces the risk of evidence of what may be false confession being relied upon too readily. The majority of the text, however, focuses on his involvement in two 1974 Icelandic assumed murder cases and his contribution to the appeals (and eventual exonerations) of the five convicted defendants.
Gisli’s route to international eminence commenced with the Icelandic Police, where he worked as a part-time constable in Reykjavik in 1973 and later as a detective with the Criminal Investigation Police. It was during his time in these roles that the seeds which gave rise to the principal focus of the book – the disappearances and presumed deaths of two young men and their consequences – were sown, coming to eventual and dramatic fruition 44 years later.
‘It used to be thought that save in the case of the very obviously disturbed, people did not voluntarily confess to crimes which they had not committed’ (letter to the author from Tom Bingham when Senior Law Lord, 26/09/07). In his early days as an expert witness Gisli was hampered by this mindset in his efforts to persuade judges and juries that an apparently convincing confession might be built on straw. But time passed and his reputation grew. Gisli has, single-handedly as a forensic expert, greatly enhanced the reputation of the England and Wales criminal justice system worldwide and, over 35 years, revolutionised its forensic psychology landscape.
Much of the earlier passages in the book (Part I) reiterate and expand upon the contents of Gisli’s previous published works, notably ‘The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions, a Handbook’ (John Wiley and Sons, 2003). These comprise a useful and authoritative description of the development of the learning and science which he has made his own unique speciality, accompanied by the fascinating histories of many of the most notorious cases in which, both as a defence and prosecution expert witness, he has been involved
But it is Gisli’s exposé – the bulk of the text (Parts II-III) – of the Reykjavik assumed murders, their background, the wrongful convictions of the five defendants based on questionable and inappropriate interrogative techniques, the long road to their ultimate vindication, Gisli’s dogged and commendable determination to put right Iceland’s most memorable miscarriage of justice and his highly significant role in the quashing of the convictions – following, in another irony, the book’s publication – which provides its most intriguing elements and makes it read as an extraordinarily compelling work of true crime drama
Set against a lifetime of remedying injustice, this is Gisli’s swansong. It is exquisitely ironic that after spending much of his career achieving his ambitions in other jurisdictions he should have returned to the country of his birth, with a population of 340,000, to correct a miscarriage whose origins date back to when he set out on his chosen path as a young man.
Police investigators, judges, fact finders and legal practitioners must always be aware of the potential fragility of suspects’ confessions, however superficially plausible and convincing they might appear on initial consideration. This book explains why and should be mandatory reading for all professionals involved in the criminal justice system.
About the reviewer: Anthony Heaton-Armstrong is a barrister at Foundry Chambers.
Gisli Gudjonsson has enjoyed a most remarkable career. He is the world’s foremost expert on the science of false confessions, has given evidence on the subject in numerous landmark cases both in the UK and other jurisdictions and has been responsible for the development of the law in this field, as reflected in the many revisions of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 Codes of Practice, in which he had such a significant hand. His work is invariably cited in forensic psychological reports which address issues concerning fitness to plead and susceptibility to false confession.
The book is partly autobiographical and catalogues Gisli’s personal history and his involvement in various notorious cases – the ‘Birmingham Six’, the ‘Guildford Four’, the ‘Tottenham Three’ (Raghip), Judith Ward, Pendleton, the ‘Cardiff Three’ (Miller) and many others. He summarises the gestation and fruition of the science and law which now reduces the risk of evidence of what may be false confession being relied upon too readily. The majority of the text, however, focuses on his involvement in two 1974 Icelandic assumed murder cases and his contribution to the appeals (and eventual exonerations) of the five convicted defendants.
Gisli’s route to international eminence commenced with the Icelandic Police, where he worked as a part-time constable in Reykjavik in 1973 and later as a detective with the Criminal Investigation Police. It was during his time in these roles that the seeds which gave rise to the principal focus of the book – the disappearances and presumed deaths of two young men and their consequences – were sown, coming to eventual and dramatic fruition 44 years later.
‘It used to be thought that save in the case of the very obviously disturbed, people did not voluntarily confess to crimes which they had not committed’ (letter to the author from Tom Bingham when Senior Law Lord, 26/09/07). In his early days as an expert witness Gisli was hampered by this mindset in his efforts to persuade judges and juries that an apparently convincing confession might be built on straw. But time passed and his reputation grew. Gisli has, single-handedly as a forensic expert, greatly enhanced the reputation of the England and Wales criminal justice system worldwide and, over 35 years, revolutionised its forensic psychology landscape.
Much of the earlier passages in the book (Part I) reiterate and expand upon the contents of Gisli’s previous published works, notably ‘The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions, a Handbook’ (John Wiley and Sons, 2003). These comprise a useful and authoritative description of the development of the learning and science which he has made his own unique speciality, accompanied by the fascinating histories of many of the most notorious cases in which, both as a defence and prosecution expert witness, he has been involved
But it is Gisli’s exposé – the bulk of the text (Parts II-III) – of the Reykjavik assumed murders, their background, the wrongful convictions of the five defendants based on questionable and inappropriate interrogative techniques, the long road to their ultimate vindication, Gisli’s dogged and commendable determination to put right Iceland’s most memorable miscarriage of justice and his highly significant role in the quashing of the convictions – following, in another irony, the book’s publication – which provides its most intriguing elements and makes it read as an extraordinarily compelling work of true crime drama
Set against a lifetime of remedying injustice, this is Gisli’s swansong. It is exquisitely ironic that after spending much of his career achieving his ambitions in other jurisdictions he should have returned to the country of his birth, with a population of 340,000, to correct a miscarriage whose origins date back to when he set out on his chosen path as a young man.
Police investigators, judges, fact finders and legal practitioners must always be aware of the potential fragility of suspects’ confessions, however superficially plausible and convincing they might appear on initial consideration. This book explains why and should be mandatory reading for all professionals involved in the criminal justice system.
About the reviewer: Anthony Heaton-Armstrong is a barrister at Foundry Chambers.
Barbara Mills KC, the new Chair of the Bar, outlines some key themes and priorities
A family lawyer has won a £500 donation for her preferred charity, an education centre for women from disadvantaged backgrounds, thanks to drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory AlphaBiolabs’ Giving Back campaign
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management highlights some of the ways you can cut your IHT bill
Rachel Davenport breaks down everything you need to know about AlphaBiolabs’ industry-leading laboratory testing services for legal matters
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
What's it like being a legal trainee at the Crown Prosecution Service? Amy describes what drew her to the role, the skills required and a typical day in the life
Barbara Mills KC wants to raise the profile of the family Bar. She also wants to improve wellbeing and enhance equality, diversity and inclusion in the profession. She talks to Joshua Rozenberg KC (hon) about her plans for the year ahead
Professor Dominic Regan and Seán Jones KC identify good value bottles across the price spectrum – from festive fizz to reliable reds
Governments who play fast and loose with the law get into real trouble, says the new Attorney General. The Rt Hon Lord Hermer KC talks to Anthony Inglese CB about what drew this boy from Cardiff to the Bar, bringing the barrister ethos to the front bench, and how he will be measuring success
Mark Neale, Director General of the Bar Standards Board, offers an update on the Equality Rules consultation
