*/
David Josse QC discusses Slobodan Praljak’s dramatic death
The death of Slobodan Praljak, who at the moment that he learnt that his appeal had been rejected fatally drank a small quantity of poison from a vial whilst saying in Croatian ‘Judges, Slobodan Praljak is not a war criminal, with disdain I reject your verdict’ has left many asking various questions.
Not least among these is how he managed to get hold of the lethal poison?
As someone who was a regular visitor to the United Nations Detention Unit (UNDU) in The Hague where he was held, I can confirm that the security is tight. Indeed, the UNDU is a separate unit within the local Dutch prison and any visitor to the UNDU must pass through both the local Dutch security as well as that provided by the UN. However, it would be naïve to think that it would be difficult to smuggle a small amount of poison into the prison. After all security is tight in UK prisons but they are still full of illegal drugs.
Far more interesting is what prompted Praljak to this desperate act? Firstly, it is worth observing that Praljak was a man of many parts. He rose to the rank of General in the Croatian Armed Forces. Yet he had studied Dramatic Arts and was a well known TV and film director.
His sense of the theatrical permeated the whole of his mammoth and unwieldy trial. He faced an indictment with five other men and the trial itself from the actual opening through to the rendering of judgement took over seven years. The appeal process then took a further four years. In part, this was due to the leeway that the Trial Chamber gave Praljak. Much of the time he was allowed to be his own advocate endlessly cross examining many witness (eg the BBC journalist Jeremy Bowen). At other times he was able to call on either of his two counsel to address the Court and/or deal with witnesses on his behalf. If this wasn’t bad enough, it transpired that Praljak had misled the Tribunal as to his means and somewhat absurdly in 2016 was (rather optimistically) ordered to pay almost 3 million euro in what amounted to legal aid contribution back payments (see the full text here). Despite this the Tribunal allowed him to continue to benefit from the assistance of counsel through the appeal process.
In short, the judges of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) permitted Praljak to run them a merry dance. Largely through a lack of robustness they had allowed him to make the trial his stage. The rendering of the judgment in his appeal was quite literally the last act in what had long turned into a tragic farce. Had he not killed himself he would have faded into obscurity and be sent to serve the remainder of his sentence in some far-flung part of Europe. Instead, with the benefit of a live internet feed and with a true sense of theatre Praljak was determined to dominate the final scene. He succeeded in the most extraordinary and dramatic fashion.
Contributor David Josse QC is Head of Chambers at 5SAH
David Josse KC is a Vice-Chair of the Bar Council International Committee and Head of Chambers at 5 St Andrew’s Hill (5SAH). He specialises in extradition, human rights, and international war crimes. David spent five years at the ICTY defending in two lengthy trials. Firstly, representing a leading Bosnian Serb politician charged with genocide and ethnic cleansing and secondly, a General facing a variety of allegations relating to the Srebrenica massacre.
The death of Slobodan Praljak, who at the moment that he learnt that his appeal had been rejected fatally drank a small quantity of poison from a vial whilst saying in Croatian ‘Judges, Slobodan Praljak is not a war criminal, with disdain I reject your verdict’ has left many asking various questions.
Not least among these is how he managed to get hold of the lethal poison?
As someone who was a regular visitor to the United Nations Detention Unit (UNDU) in The Hague where he was held, I can confirm that the security is tight. Indeed, the UNDU is a separate unit within the local Dutch prison and any visitor to the UNDU must pass through both the local Dutch security as well as that provided by the UN. However, it would be naïve to think that it would be difficult to smuggle a small amount of poison into the prison. After all security is tight in UK prisons but they are still full of illegal drugs.
Far more interesting is what prompted Praljak to this desperate act? Firstly, it is worth observing that Praljak was a man of many parts. He rose to the rank of General in the Croatian Armed Forces. Yet he had studied Dramatic Arts and was a well known TV and film director.
His sense of the theatrical permeated the whole of his mammoth and unwieldy trial. He faced an indictment with five other men and the trial itself from the actual opening through to the rendering of judgement took over seven years. The appeal process then took a further four years. In part, this was due to the leeway that the Trial Chamber gave Praljak. Much of the time he was allowed to be his own advocate endlessly cross examining many witness (eg the BBC journalist Jeremy Bowen). At other times he was able to call on either of his two counsel to address the Court and/or deal with witnesses on his behalf. If this wasn’t bad enough, it transpired that Praljak had misled the Tribunal as to his means and somewhat absurdly in 2016 was (rather optimistically) ordered to pay almost 3 million euro in what amounted to legal aid contribution back payments (see the full text here). Despite this the Tribunal allowed him to continue to benefit from the assistance of counsel through the appeal process.
In short, the judges of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) permitted Praljak to run them a merry dance. Largely through a lack of robustness they had allowed him to make the trial his stage. The rendering of the judgment in his appeal was quite literally the last act in what had long turned into a tragic farce. Had he not killed himself he would have faded into obscurity and be sent to serve the remainder of his sentence in some far-flung part of Europe. Instead, with the benefit of a live internet feed and with a true sense of theatre Praljak was determined to dominate the final scene. He succeeded in the most extraordinary and dramatic fashion.
Contributor David Josse QC is Head of Chambers at 5SAH
David Josse QC discusses Slobodan Praljak’s dramatic death
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier
