*/
Barristers are not obliged to speak to the media and must be wary of appearing to promote themselves when doing so, the Bar Council’s ethics committee has reiterated in an updated note.
The committee reminded barristers that since the removal of the prohibition in April 2013, they are permitted to talk to the media ‘generally and in respect of concluded litigation’ in which they acted, subject to their general professional duties.
But pointing to guidance from the Bar Standards Board (The BSB Handbook: gC22 and Media Comment Guidance), it noted that they are under ‘no obligation’ to do so and that it is not a legal service and does not form part of barristers’ duties to act in the best interests of any of their clients.
As such, it warned that barristers may not be insured against any consequences of expressing a personal opinion to the media. The BSB also reminded barristers of the risk of liability in contempt, defamation or malicious falsehood that can arise personally, or for the lay client.
Barristers were advised to consider the following before speaking to the press: the nature and type of proceedings; the stage proceedings have reached; the nature of the proposed comments; what information they are permitted to convey; whether they need the client’s consent; and the likelihood of prejudice arising from the comments.
They were reminded that their role is not to act as their client’s mouthpiece or to identify themselves personally with their client’s cause, and warned that in speaking to the media their motives for doing so may be called into question.
‘Even if this is not what you intend’ by speaking to the press, it warns, ‘you run the risk of appearing to promote your own interests over those of your client’.
Barristers are not obliged to speak to the media and must be wary of appearing to promote themselves when doing so, the Bar Council’s ethics committee has reiterated in an updated note.
The committee reminded barristers that since the removal of the prohibition in April 2013, they are permitted to talk to the media ‘generally and in respect of concluded litigation’ in which they acted, subject to their general professional duties.
But pointing to guidance from the Bar Standards Board (The BSB Handbook: gC22 and Media Comment Guidance), it noted that they are under ‘no obligation’ to do so and that it is not a legal service and does not form part of barristers’ duties to act in the best interests of any of their clients.
As such, it warned that barristers may not be insured against any consequences of expressing a personal opinion to the media. The BSB also reminded barristers of the risk of liability in contempt, defamation or malicious falsehood that can arise personally, or for the lay client.
Barristers were advised to consider the following before speaking to the press: the nature and type of proceedings; the stage proceedings have reached; the nature of the proposed comments; what information they are permitted to convey; whether they need the client’s consent; and the likelihood of prejudice arising from the comments.
They were reminded that their role is not to act as their client’s mouthpiece or to identify themselves personally with their client’s cause, and warned that in speaking to the media their motives for doing so may be called into question.
‘Even if this is not what you intend’ by speaking to the press, it warns, ‘you run the risk of appearing to promote your own interests over those of your client’.
Chair of the Bar reflects on 2025
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
Revolt Cycling in Holborn, London’s first sustainable fitness studio, invites barristers to join the revolution – turning pedal power into clean energy
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, reflects on how the company’s Giving Back ethos continues to make a difference to communities across the UK
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Professor Dominic Regan and Seán Jones KC present their best buys for this holiday season
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Six months of court observation at the Old Bailey: APPEAL’s Dr Nisha Waller and Tehreem Sultan report their findings on prosecution practices under joint enterprise
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum disorder remains poorly understood in the criminal justice system. Does Alex Henry’s joint enterprise conviction expose the need to audit prisons? asks Dr Felicity Gerry KC
With automation now deeply embedded in the Department for Work Pensions, Alexander McColl and Alexa Thompson review what we know, what we don’t and avenues for legal challenge