*/
The cost of employing the staff team is often the largest single element of expenditure for a set of chambers. Are your set’s employees ‘fully engaged’ or are they simply ‘coming to work’? asks Catherine Calder
How engaged is your set’s staff team? The ADP Research Institute’s Global Study of Engagement 2018 concluded from a sample of 19,346 employees across 19 countries that only 15.9% were ‘fully engaged’, with the rest simply ‘coming to work’. Similarly, the 2018 State of the Global Workplace Report from Gallup found that 85% of employees were either ‘not engaged or actively disengaged’ at work.
Employee engagement is defined by the CIPD as ‘emphasis[ing] both employees’ well-being and performance… offer[ing] a mutual gains view of the employment relationship, seeking the good of employees and the organisation in tandem’. Its benefits are well established. While we may be understandably wary of some of the theory – terminology such as ‘enculturation trajectory’ and ‘neuro-linguistic programmes’ are unlikely ever to be bandied about at the Bar – it’s hard to ignore the results. A University of Bath School of Management 2012 report entitled Engage for Success: The Evidence sets out a slew of persuasive statistics, including that:
The link between employee engagement and the success of the organisation is perhaps particularly relevant to sets of chambers as providers of professional services. The Harvard Business Review notes that ‘exemplary service companies emphasise the importance of each employee and customer’ as part of a service-profit chain which, in summary, sees a positive employee experience as driving retention and productivity, so improving service to in turn build the client loyalty which leads to growth and profitability. This profitability allows further investment (via the contribution in sets of chambers) into the employee experience, to complete the circle.
Certainly, a chambers’ product is its people, and that’s the employees as well as the barristers: 20 years of meetings with solicitors and other clients have confirmed to me that the relationship with the staff team plays a crucial part in their choice of chambers and counsel. It’s clearly important then that those relationships, built out of multiple small interactions over weeks, months and years, are as effective as possible for the prosperity of the set and everyone working within it as members or staff.
Although ‘happy staff = happy clients’ has become something of a LinkedIn platitude, it is no less true for that and, as noted in the internal communications publication, Inside, ‘your brand is only as good as the worst decision that any one of your employees makes’. It makes sense to do all you can to make those decisions work for your set.
Further, the connection between employee engagement and retention of staff is particularly relevant to chambers given the retention issues we face. Of course, the Bar is not unique in having to address the costs of increasing staff turnover. The most recent Resourcing and Talent Planning Survey from CIPD/Hay (2017) reported that more than 80% of organisations had challenges retaining one or more categories of staff in the preceding 12 months and that the median rate of labour turnover had increased to 16.5%. This is in part a millennial phenomenon. According to the 2018 Deloitte Millennial Survey, 43% expect to leave their jobs within two years and only 28% seek to stay beyond five. This is striking since millennials (currently aged 25-34) represent the largest group of clerks, accounting for 29% of the Institute of Barristers’ Clerks membership according to a recent study. Given that Deloitte found that Generation Z employees (aged 20-24) are even less loyal, with 61% saying that they would leave their jobs within two years if they were given the choice, this problem is unlikely to go away.
Working to engage employees won’t necessarily stop them leaving – people’s careers take them in different directions – and of course a certain level of turnover is healthy to refresh the dynamics and bring in new perspectives. But a focus on employee engagement might help to keep colleagues on-board and on-side for longer, preventing premature or acrimonious departures and making transitions smoother when they occur.
For these and many other reasons – not least the creation of a happier day-to-day working environment – employee engagement might perhaps be higher on the list of agenda items for the annual chambers meeting. The question is, how to approach it? Unfortunately, as The Economist has noted, it isn’t simply a case of realising that ‘all you need to do is to be nice to your employees and miracles will happen’.
Of course every set will find its own approach, but for Serjeants’ Inn it has been about an emphasis on treating our staff as the professionals they are – which means giving more and expecting more – and, as with any management strategy, working hard on communication. Our 12 top tips are as follows:
In summary, we are trying to ingrain an employee experience founded on the principle that people will contribute as professionals if they are treated as professionals, and that everyone works better in a positive and even fun environment. Obviously this can’t be forced but, as Andrew Carnegie observed, ‘there is little success where there is little laughter’.
Of course, the success of this strategy depends also on the right approach on numerous related issues such as recruitment and training, and we have further to go: we are about to overhaul our appraisal system, for example. We are conscious that we need to keep interrogating and improving our approach, tailoring it to individuals in what will always be an evolving process.
But we believe that this philosophy has led to clear results in service to clients and recent success which, over the last three years, has encompassed substantial rises in turnover year on year despite pressure on funding in our fields; the expansion of our silk team from 9 to 22 QCs; and numerous accolades such as – most recently – the 2019 Legal 500 Client Award for Communication and Innovation. Most importantly, this is in the context of the work by Serjeants’ Inn barristers in cutting-edge cases including the litigation allowing a claimant in a clinical negligence case to receive surrogacy costs as a new head of damages and the test case concerning the issue of illegality as a defence in medical malpractice actions, both of which are due before the Supreme Court.
This momentum would be impossible without a strong and cohesive staff team, supporting our barristers in concentrating on their clients and cases. Like the Harvard Business Review, we have found employee engagement, ‘a simple, elegant, and ultimately tough-minded way to build profitability in a service business’.
How engaged is your set’s staff team? The ADP Research Institute’s Global Study of Engagement 2018 concluded from a sample of 19,346 employees across 19 countries that only 15.9% were ‘fully engaged’, with the rest simply ‘coming to work’. Similarly, the 2018 State of the Global Workplace Report from Gallup found that 85% of employees were either ‘not engaged or actively disengaged’ at work.
Employee engagement is defined by the CIPD as ‘emphasis[ing] both employees’ well-being and performance… offer[ing] a mutual gains view of the employment relationship, seeking the good of employees and the organisation in tandem’. Its benefits are well established. While we may be understandably wary of some of the theory – terminology such as ‘enculturation trajectory’ and ‘neuro-linguistic programmes’ are unlikely ever to be bandied about at the Bar – it’s hard to ignore the results. A University of Bath School of Management 2012 report entitled Engage for Success: The Evidence sets out a slew of persuasive statistics, including that:
The link between employee engagement and the success of the organisation is perhaps particularly relevant to sets of chambers as providers of professional services. The Harvard Business Review notes that ‘exemplary service companies emphasise the importance of each employee and customer’ as part of a service-profit chain which, in summary, sees a positive employee experience as driving retention and productivity, so improving service to in turn build the client loyalty which leads to growth and profitability. This profitability allows further investment (via the contribution in sets of chambers) into the employee experience, to complete the circle.
Certainly, a chambers’ product is its people, and that’s the employees as well as the barristers: 20 years of meetings with solicitors and other clients have confirmed to me that the relationship with the staff team plays a crucial part in their choice of chambers and counsel. It’s clearly important then that those relationships, built out of multiple small interactions over weeks, months and years, are as effective as possible for the prosperity of the set and everyone working within it as members or staff.
Although ‘happy staff = happy clients’ has become something of a LinkedIn platitude, it is no less true for that and, as noted in the internal communications publication, Inside, ‘your brand is only as good as the worst decision that any one of your employees makes’. It makes sense to do all you can to make those decisions work for your set.
Further, the connection between employee engagement and retention of staff is particularly relevant to chambers given the retention issues we face. Of course, the Bar is not unique in having to address the costs of increasing staff turnover. The most recent Resourcing and Talent Planning Survey from CIPD/Hay (2017) reported that more than 80% of organisations had challenges retaining one or more categories of staff in the preceding 12 months and that the median rate of labour turnover had increased to 16.5%. This is in part a millennial phenomenon. According to the 2018 Deloitte Millennial Survey, 43% expect to leave their jobs within two years and only 28% seek to stay beyond five. This is striking since millennials (currently aged 25-34) represent the largest group of clerks, accounting for 29% of the Institute of Barristers’ Clerks membership according to a recent study. Given that Deloitte found that Generation Z employees (aged 20-24) are even less loyal, with 61% saying that they would leave their jobs within two years if they were given the choice, this problem is unlikely to go away.
Working to engage employees won’t necessarily stop them leaving – people’s careers take them in different directions – and of course a certain level of turnover is healthy to refresh the dynamics and bring in new perspectives. But a focus on employee engagement might help to keep colleagues on-board and on-side for longer, preventing premature or acrimonious departures and making transitions smoother when they occur.
For these and many other reasons – not least the creation of a happier day-to-day working environment – employee engagement might perhaps be higher on the list of agenda items for the annual chambers meeting. The question is, how to approach it? Unfortunately, as The Economist has noted, it isn’t simply a case of realising that ‘all you need to do is to be nice to your employees and miracles will happen’.
Of course every set will find its own approach, but for Serjeants’ Inn it has been about an emphasis on treating our staff as the professionals they are – which means giving more and expecting more – and, as with any management strategy, working hard on communication. Our 12 top tips are as follows:
In summary, we are trying to ingrain an employee experience founded on the principle that people will contribute as professionals if they are treated as professionals, and that everyone works better in a positive and even fun environment. Obviously this can’t be forced but, as Andrew Carnegie observed, ‘there is little success where there is little laughter’.
Of course, the success of this strategy depends also on the right approach on numerous related issues such as recruitment and training, and we have further to go: we are about to overhaul our appraisal system, for example. We are conscious that we need to keep interrogating and improving our approach, tailoring it to individuals in what will always be an evolving process.
But we believe that this philosophy has led to clear results in service to clients and recent success which, over the last three years, has encompassed substantial rises in turnover year on year despite pressure on funding in our fields; the expansion of our silk team from 9 to 22 QCs; and numerous accolades such as – most recently – the 2019 Legal 500 Client Award for Communication and Innovation. Most importantly, this is in the context of the work by Serjeants’ Inn barristers in cutting-edge cases including the litigation allowing a claimant in a clinical negligence case to receive surrogacy costs as a new head of damages and the test case concerning the issue of illegality as a defence in medical malpractice actions, both of which are due before the Supreme Court.
This momentum would be impossible without a strong and cohesive staff team, supporting our barristers in concentrating on their clients and cases. Like the Harvard Business Review, we have found employee engagement, ‘a simple, elegant, and ultimately tough-minded way to build profitability in a service business’.
The cost of employing the staff team is often the largest single element of expenditure for a set of chambers. Are your set’s employees ‘fully engaged’ or are they simply ‘coming to work’? asks Catherine Calder
The beginning of the legal year offers the opportunity for a renewed commitment to justice and the rule of law both at home and abroad
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
Providing bespoke mortgage and protection solutions for barristers
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
Tom Cosgrove KC looks at the government’s radical planning reform and the opportunities and challenges ahead for practitioners
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series
Yasmin Ilhan explains the Law Commission’s proposals for a quicker, easier and more effective contempt of court regime