*/
Lord Hoffmann has criticised the European Court of Human Rights for behaving like the US Supreme Court on human rights issues.
Delivering the annual Judicial Studies Board lecture in March, Lord Hoffmann reiterated his support for the text of the European Convention on Human Rights, and its embodiment in the Human Rights Act 1998.
However, he questioned the Court’s application of the “margin of appreciation” between universal human rights and the recognition that these are applied by the national courts. “In practice, the Court has not taken the doctrine of the margin of appreciation nearly far enough,” he said. “It has been unable to resist the temptation to aggrandise its jurisdiction and to impose uniform rules on Member States. It considers itself the equivalent of the Supreme Court of the United States, laying down a federal law of Europe.” While “the practical expression of concepts” may change over the years, the Court was not entitled to “introduce wholly new concepts, such as the protection of the environment, into an international treaty which makes no mention of them, simply because it would be more in accordance with the spirit of the times,” he said.
While the UK legal system was not “perfect”, Lord Hoffmann argued that “detailed decisions about how it could be improved should be made in London, either by our democratic institutions or by judicial bodies which, like the Supreme Court of the United States, are integral with our own society and respected as such”.
Delivering the annual Judicial Studies Board lecture in March, Lord Hoffmann reiterated his support for the text of the European Convention on Human Rights, and its embodiment in the Human Rights Act 1998.
However, he questioned the Court’s application of the “margin of appreciation” between universal human rights and the recognition that these are applied by the national courts. “In practice, the Court has not taken the doctrine of the margin of appreciation nearly far enough,” he said. “It has been unable to resist the temptation to aggrandise its jurisdiction and to impose uniform rules on Member States. It considers itself the equivalent of the Supreme Court of the United States, laying down a federal law of Europe.” While “the practical expression of concepts” may change over the years, the Court was not entitled to “introduce wholly new concepts, such as the protection of the environment, into an international treaty which makes no mention of them, simply because it would be more in accordance with the spirit of the times,” he said.
While the UK legal system was not “perfect”, Lord Hoffmann argued that “detailed decisions about how it could be improved should be made in London, either by our democratic institutions or by judicial bodies which, like the Supreme Court of the United States, are integral with our own society and respected as such”.
Lord Hoffmann has criticised the European Court of Human Rights for behaving like the US Supreme Court on human rights issues.
The beginning of the legal year offers the opportunity for a renewed commitment to justice and the rule of law both at home and abroad
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
Providing bespoke mortgage and protection solutions for barristers
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
Yasmin Ilhan explains the Law Commission’s proposals for a quicker, easier and more effective contempt of court regime
Irresponsible use of AI can lead to serious and embarrassing consequences. Sam Thomas briefs barristers on the five key risks and how to avoid them
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series
