*/
Lord Phillips, President of the Supreme Court, has mounted a staunch defence of the Human Rights Act 1988.
In a forthright speech at Gresham College in June, Lord Phillips said the 1998 Act was “a vital part of the foundation of our fight against terrorism”. “In my opinion, the enactment of the Human Rights Act by the previous administration was an outstanding contribution to the upholding of the rule of law in this country and one for which it deserves great credit,” he said. “Because it requires the courts to scrutinise not merely executive action but Acts of Parliament to make sure that these respect human rights, the Act has given the Supreme Court some of the functions of a Constitutional Court. Drawing the right line between protecting the rights of the individual and respecting the supremacy of Parliament is, I believe, our greatest challenge.”
However, he noted that the Act and the judges who applied it had been unfairly criticised by senior politicians and the media. Charles Clarke, when Home Secretary, claimed, “the judiciary bears not the slightest responsibility for protecting the public” Lord Phillips said: “Charles Clarke failed to appreciate that it is the duty of the judiciary to apply the laws that have been enacted by Parliament.”
In a forthright speech at Gresham College in June, Lord Phillips said the 1998 Act was “a vital part of the foundation of our fight against terrorism”. “In my opinion, the enactment of the Human Rights Act by the previous administration was an outstanding contribution to the upholding of the rule of law in this country and one for which it deserves great credit,” he said. “Because it requires the courts to scrutinise not merely executive action but Acts of Parliament to make sure that these respect human rights, the Act has given the Supreme Court some of the functions of a Constitutional Court. Drawing the right line between protecting the rights of the individual and respecting the supremacy of Parliament is, I believe, our greatest challenge.”
However, he noted that the Act and the judges who applied it had been unfairly criticised by senior politicians and the media. Charles Clarke, when Home Secretary, claimed, “the judiciary bears not the slightest responsibility for protecting the public” Lord Phillips said: “Charles Clarke failed to appreciate that it is the duty of the judiciary to apply the laws that have been enacted by Parliament.”
Lord Phillips, President of the Supreme Court, has mounted a staunch defence of the Human Rights Act 1988.
Kirsty Brimelow KC, Chair of the Bar, sets our course for 2026
What meaningful steps can you take in 2026 to advance your legal career? asks Thomas Cowan of St Pauls Chambers
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, explains why drugs may appear in test results, despite the donor denying use of them
Asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
AlphaBiolabs has donated £500 to The Christie Charity through its Giving Back initiative, helping to support cancer care, treatment and research across Greater Manchester, Cheshire and further afield
Q and A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today
With pupillage application season under way, Laura Wright reflects on her route to ‘tech barrister’ and offers advice for those aiming at a career at the Bar
Jury-less trial proposals threaten fairness, legitimacy and democracy without ending the backlog, writes Professor Cheryl Thomas KC (Hon), the UK’s leading expert on juries, judges and courts
Are you ready for the new way to do tax returns? David Southern KC explains the biggest change since HMRC launched self-assessment more than 30 years ago... and its impact on the Bar
Marking one year since a Bar disciplinary tribunal dismissed all charges against her, Dr Charlotte Proudman discusses the experience, her formative years and next steps. Interview by Anthony Inglese CB
