*/
What factors are driving client complaints and how can barristers put them right in house? Insights from the Legal Ombudsman
Because of the nature of the situations giving rise to a legal need, many, if not most people using legal services are vulnerable in some way. Needing a barrister, and having to navigate the court process, might indicate particularly high level of vulnerability among clients. Given this, it’s clear barristers should be doing all they can to a provide a high standard of service.
At the Legal Ombudsman (LeO), when someone refers a complaint to us, we consider both the standard of service and complaint handling they’ve received. If we think either or both weren’t adequate – our test is the balance of probabilities – we direct the legal provider concerned to put things right. We also can and do report matters of wider conduct to the regulator (in barristers’ case, the Bar Standards Board (BSB)) when required to do so under the Legal Services Act.
But it isn’t enough for us just to keep putting right complaints that have already happened – the legal profession needs to engage with our feedback to ensure they don’t arise in the first place. This is embedded in our new three-year strategy. As part of that strategy, we’ll be looking to expand the range of insights and resources we share with the legal sector – but we already have a significant amount of guidance on our website, run regular webinars, and regularly attend events and forums to share good practice.
So what do we see – and how can barristers act on this to ensure they’re providing clients with the best possible experience at extremely challenging times in their lives?
BSB-regulated practitioners represent a smaller share of our casework than practitioners carrying out higher-volume and more routine, transactional legal matters like conveyancing – although they do still form a sizeable proportion of the complaints we receive.
Our 2022/23 data shows more than a third of clients are being let down – with LeO finding evidence of poor service in upwards of 35% of complaints we investigated about BSB-regulated practitioners in the last two years. Indications are that 2023/24’s figures are even higher.
In addition, in terms of complaints handling, a quarter of clients over recent years haven’t received what we judge to be an acceptable response to the concerns they’ve raised.
As well as these stubborn proportions of service and complaints-handling issues, the areas where consumers feel barristers have fallen short are very consistent over time. In order, they are:
It’s worth singling out communication. Although a single category of complaint, it also underpins many of the other categories as a significant and recurring issue. For example, it can be at the root of mismatched expectations, a sense of receiving poor advice, unexpected bills and unhappiness over delays.
Fundamentally, if a client feels they’re up to date and clear about what’s happening, they’re unlikely to complain. While barristers may be working on a number of matters at any given time, an individual client’s own situation will naturally be the most important to them. To avoid them feeling like they’re not being given sufficient attention, it’s vital to manage expectations about how and when work will be done. We’d expect to see a barrister set this out clearly and provide updates if things change.
When looking to resolve a complaint, barristers should adopt the same mindset as our investigators and Ombudsmen – taking the lead from the key questions set out in our approach to putting things right:
We find complaint responses from barristers can be defensive – perhaps given the nature of their work, or because some of the issues raised might feel uncomfortable or unfair. This runs counter to the objective of ensuring the client feels heard and seeking to resolve concerns at the earliest possible opportunity. We find that responses are sometimes vague, unclear or removed from the issues at hand.
When you’re responding to a complaint, these pointers – while non-exhaustive – can help to resolve them quickly and fairly:
As we look to develop the insight and guidance we share, we welcome feedback from barristers about new and different support and resources we could provide. Feel free to contact us at advice@legalombudsman.org.uk.
Because of the nature of the situations giving rise to a legal need, many, if not most people using legal services are vulnerable in some way. Needing a barrister, and having to navigate the court process, might indicate particularly high level of vulnerability among clients. Given this, it’s clear barristers should be doing all they can to a provide a high standard of service.
At the Legal Ombudsman (LeO), when someone refers a complaint to us, we consider both the standard of service and complaint handling they’ve received. If we think either or both weren’t adequate – our test is the balance of probabilities – we direct the legal provider concerned to put things right. We also can and do report matters of wider conduct to the regulator (in barristers’ case, the Bar Standards Board (BSB)) when required to do so under the Legal Services Act.
But it isn’t enough for us just to keep putting right complaints that have already happened – the legal profession needs to engage with our feedback to ensure they don’t arise in the first place. This is embedded in our new three-year strategy. As part of that strategy, we’ll be looking to expand the range of insights and resources we share with the legal sector – but we already have a significant amount of guidance on our website, run regular webinars, and regularly attend events and forums to share good practice.
So what do we see – and how can barristers act on this to ensure they’re providing clients with the best possible experience at extremely challenging times in their lives?
BSB-regulated practitioners represent a smaller share of our casework than practitioners carrying out higher-volume and more routine, transactional legal matters like conveyancing – although they do still form a sizeable proportion of the complaints we receive.
Our 2022/23 data shows more than a third of clients are being let down – with LeO finding evidence of poor service in upwards of 35% of complaints we investigated about BSB-regulated practitioners in the last two years. Indications are that 2023/24’s figures are even higher.
In addition, in terms of complaints handling, a quarter of clients over recent years haven’t received what we judge to be an acceptable response to the concerns they’ve raised.
As well as these stubborn proportions of service and complaints-handling issues, the areas where consumers feel barristers have fallen short are very consistent over time. In order, they are:
It’s worth singling out communication. Although a single category of complaint, it also underpins many of the other categories as a significant and recurring issue. For example, it can be at the root of mismatched expectations, a sense of receiving poor advice, unexpected bills and unhappiness over delays.
Fundamentally, if a client feels they’re up to date and clear about what’s happening, they’re unlikely to complain. While barristers may be working on a number of matters at any given time, an individual client’s own situation will naturally be the most important to them. To avoid them feeling like they’re not being given sufficient attention, it’s vital to manage expectations about how and when work will be done. We’d expect to see a barrister set this out clearly and provide updates if things change.
When looking to resolve a complaint, barristers should adopt the same mindset as our investigators and Ombudsmen – taking the lead from the key questions set out in our approach to putting things right:
We find complaint responses from barristers can be defensive – perhaps given the nature of their work, or because some of the issues raised might feel uncomfortable or unfair. This runs counter to the objective of ensuring the client feels heard and seeking to resolve concerns at the earliest possible opportunity. We find that responses are sometimes vague, unclear or removed from the issues at hand.
When you’re responding to a complaint, these pointers – while non-exhaustive – can help to resolve them quickly and fairly:
As we look to develop the insight and guidance we share, we welcome feedback from barristers about new and different support and resources we could provide. Feel free to contact us at advice@legalombudsman.org.uk.
What factors are driving client complaints and how can barristers put them right in house? Insights from the Legal Ombudsman
Chair of the Bar finds common ground on legal services between our two jurisdictions, plus an update on jury trials
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Ever wondered what a pupillage is like at the CPS? This Q and A provides an insight into the training, experience and next steps
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today