*/
Women made up almost half of those recommended for appointment to the Bench last year, but fewer than 10% came from an ethnic minority background, statistics from the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) revealed.
Of the 308 recommendations made between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2016, 140 (45%) were women and only 28 (9%) declared themselves to be from an ethnic minority, while nine (3%) said they had a disability.
Of the of 21 recommendations made for senior posts – above the level of the High Court – only four (19%) were women.
Looking at the recommendations for Recorders – the first rung on the ladder to a full-time judicial career – the Bar Council calculated that white applicants were three times more likely to succeed than candidates from a minority ethnic group.
Sam Mercer, head of equality and diversity at the Bar Council, said: ‘At every stage of the process, BAME [black and minority ethnic] applicants did less well than their white colleagues.
‘If you are a white lawyer applying to become a Recorder you have a one in 10 chance of success. If you belong to a minority ethnic group, that drops to one in 33.’
Mercer said: ‘This inequality is unacceptable. We urgently need to work in partnership with organisations across the legal sector, and with government, to find out why this distortion is occurring and take immediate measures for correction.’
She added: ‘Those appointed as Recorders make up the pool from which the ranks of the senior judiciary are drawn. Lack of diversity at this level has huge implications for the ethnic make-up of our most influential and respected tier of public servants.’
Mercer also noted that since 2012, there have been no BAME applications or appointments at all to the Court of Appeal and there are still no BAME judges in the Supreme Court.
The JAC statistics revealed that the equal merit provision, which has been available for all exercises since July 2015, was used in 14 instances during the reporting period.
The provision means that, in a selection exercise where there are two or more candidates of equal merit, a candidate may be selected for a post for the purpose of increasing judicial diversity.
Women made up almost half of those recommended for appointment to the Bench last year, but fewer than 10% came from an ethnic minority background, statistics from the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) revealed.
Of the 308 recommendations made between 1 April 2015 and 31 March 2016, 140 (45%) were women and only 28 (9%) declared themselves to be from an ethnic minority, while nine (3%) said they had a disability.
Of the of 21 recommendations made for senior posts – above the level of the High Court – only four (19%) were women.
Looking at the recommendations for Recorders – the first rung on the ladder to a full-time judicial career – the Bar Council calculated that white applicants were three times more likely to succeed than candidates from a minority ethnic group.
Sam Mercer, head of equality and diversity at the Bar Council, said: ‘At every stage of the process, BAME [black and minority ethnic] applicants did less well than their white colleagues.
‘If you are a white lawyer applying to become a Recorder you have a one in 10 chance of success. If you belong to a minority ethnic group, that drops to one in 33.’
Mercer said: ‘This inequality is unacceptable. We urgently need to work in partnership with organisations across the legal sector, and with government, to find out why this distortion is occurring and take immediate measures for correction.’
She added: ‘Those appointed as Recorders make up the pool from which the ranks of the senior judiciary are drawn. Lack of diversity at this level has huge implications for the ethnic make-up of our most influential and respected tier of public servants.’
Mercer also noted that since 2012, there have been no BAME applications or appointments at all to the Court of Appeal and there are still no BAME judges in the Supreme Court.
The JAC statistics revealed that the equal merit provision, which has been available for all exercises since July 2015, was used in 14 instances during the reporting period.
The provision means that, in a selection exercise where there are two or more candidates of equal merit, a candidate may be selected for a post for the purpose of increasing judicial diversity.
Chair of the Bar finds common ground on legal services between our two jurisdictions, plus an update on jury trials
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Ever wondered what a pupillage is like at the CPS? This Q and A provides an insight into the training, experience and next steps
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today
