*/
Belle Turner reports on the recent YBS seminar “All Change? Or not? For the Young Bar”.
At this time of great change at the Bar there is some concern as to whether young barristers at a grassroots level are engaged with the potentially career-changing decisions that senior members of chambers may be taking on behalf of their members. There is no small irony that, as a young barrister in a set wishing to become a Legal Disciplinary Practice (“LDP”), for example, the senior members of chambers may profit considerably from the work of the juniors for many years before the juniors themselves benefit. There is a sense in many of the emails which I receive that this wasn’t what people signed up for.
At the same time, however, there is a widespread acknowledgment that the Bar, and in particular the publicly-funded Bar, must change/adapt to survive in the immediate future. And that the future right now is all about survival. Consequently, the Bar Council’s Young Barristers’ Committee (“YBC”) has been working to do what it can to ensure that the young Bar involves itself fully with the decisions that are being made and, if there are any areas in which it feels disenfranchised/concerned, these are raised not only within the set/firm in question but also at the Bar Council. It is vital that young barristers engage with discussions about future models for delivery of legal services and find out what it might mean for them if they are to feel they have chosen the way forward for their futures.
An informed debate
Accordingly the YBC hosted a seminar on 11 March 2010 entitled “All Change? Or not? For the Young Bar” to give barristers under ten years’ Call an opportunity to learn about and debate the new business structures and changes to ways of working that will become possible following the changes proposed by the Bar Standards Board (“BSB”) in the way in which barristers conduct their business. Presentations from Chairman of the Bar Nick Green QC and from Patricia Robertson QC, on behalf of the BSB, highlighted those changes and the options now open to chambers and to individuals about future ways of working. The YBC recognised the need for every effort to be made to ensure that the young Bar understands the changes that are presently under discussion and arranged for the seminar to be available via video links to Birmingham, Leeds, Liverpool and Swansea.
Nick Green QC and Patricia Robertson QC shared the view in response that the new structures themselves are neutral in respect of the young Bar but there could be risks in their implementation, particularly regarding payment of proper fees and the nature of work to be undertaken by young practitioners. If they are right then the biggest challenges are within the detail of how any set operates under the new structures. What must not happen, therefore, is that within the decision-making that will be taking place over the coming months, members of the young Bar feel that there is only so much that they can say, or so far that they can put their heads above the parapet within chambers, if they have any fears or divergent views from the majority. Each set of chambers needs individually to ensure its more junior members are protected.
The critical issues
The main points arising from the seminar were:
Belle Turner is a barrister at 4 Paper Buildings and Chairman of the Young Barristers’ Committee.
At the same time, however, there is a widespread acknowledgment that the Bar, and in particular the publicly-funded Bar, must change/adapt to survive in the immediate future. And that the future right now is all about survival. Consequently, the Bar Council’s Young Barristers’ Committee (“YBC”) has been working to do what it can to ensure that the young Bar involves itself fully with the decisions that are being made and, if there are any areas in which it feels disenfranchised/concerned, these are raised not only within the set/firm in question but also at the Bar Council. It is vital that young barristers engage with discussions about future models for delivery of legal services and find out what it might mean for them if they are to feel they have chosen the way forward for their futures.
An informed debate
Accordingly the YBC hosted a seminar on 11 March 2010 entitled “All Change? Or not? For the Young Bar” to give barristers under ten years’ Call an opportunity to learn about and debate the new business structures and changes to ways of working that will become possible following the changes proposed by the Bar Standards Board (“BSB”) in the way in which barristers conduct their business. Presentations from Chairman of the Bar Nick Green QC and from Patricia Robertson QC, on behalf of the BSB, highlighted those changes and the options now open to chambers and to individuals about future ways of working. The YBC recognised the need for every effort to be made to ensure that the young Bar understands the changes that are presently under discussion and arranged for the seminar to be available via video links to Birmingham, Leeds, Liverpool and Swansea.
Nick Green QC and Patricia Robertson QC shared the view in response that the new structures themselves are neutral in respect of the young Bar but there could be risks in their implementation, particularly regarding payment of proper fees and the nature of work to be undertaken by young practitioners. If they are right then the biggest challenges are within the detail of how any set operates under the new structures. What must not happen, therefore, is that within the decision-making that will be taking place over the coming months, members of the young Bar feel that there is only so much that they can say, or so far that they can put their heads above the parapet within chambers, if they have any fears or divergent views from the majority. Each set of chambers needs individually to ensure its more junior members are protected.
The critical issues
The main points arising from the seminar were:
Belle Turner is a barrister at 4 Paper Buildings and Chairman of the Young Barristers’ Committee.
Belle Turner reports on the recent YBS seminar “All Change? Or not? For the Young Bar”.
At this time of great change at the Bar there is some concern as to whether young barristers at a grassroots level are engaged with the potentially career-changing decisions that senior members of chambers may be taking on behalf of their members. There is no small irony that, as a young barrister in a set wishing to become a Legal Disciplinary Practice (“LDP”), for example, the senior members of chambers may profit considerably from the work of the juniors for many years before the juniors themselves benefit. There is a sense in many of the emails which I receive that this wasn’t what people signed up for.
Chair of the Bar finds common ground on legal services between our two jurisdictions, plus an update on jury trials
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Ever wondered what a pupillage is like at the CPS? This Q and A provides an insight into the training, experience and next steps
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today