*/
At a packed South Eastern Circuit “road show” on 12 January Baroness Deech, Chair of the Bar Standards Board (“BSB”), described the changes made by the BSB last November to the way in which barristers can supply legal services as “the most important changes in this generation of the Bar”.
She emphasised that she had no wish to preside over fusion and that the decisions were not driven by “the need of the Bar to earn a living”; but rather to permit structures consistent with the principles in the Legal Services Act 2007.
The meeting was only one of several planned in the winter to test the views of the Bar on the way forward while Legal Services Board approval is pending on the proposed amendments to the Code.
Nick Green QC, Chairman of the Bar, said that he had seen a number of chambers’ business plans which are awaiting the green light and which show that no single model will work for everyone. Forming a legal disciplinary partnership is no longer unthinkable.
With the question and answer session dominated by criminal practitioners, the need for the Bar to earn its living was nevertheless uppermost in most people’s minds. Nick Green QC pointed out that the new rules will apply to everyone but one person pointed out that it is the publicly funded Bar, under pressure from HCA’s and Crown advocates, who are more likely to need the permissive authority to compete with solicitors, for example, by bidding to supply legal services through a “procure-co”. Views ranged widely, from those who were uncomfortable about any change to those who favour the end of the “referral profession” by revising the direct access to the client and not to have to rely upon solicitors to do what they have always had a monopoly of doing.
The road shows are likely to be attended by some 700 to 800 barristers in all but the Circuits are encouraged to set up forums to exchange information. Everyone was urged to ask questions and to keep an open mind.
Nick Green QC, Chairman of the Bar, said that he had seen a number of chambers’ business plans which are awaiting the green light and which show that no single model will work for everyone. Forming a legal disciplinary partnership is no longer unthinkable.
With the question and answer session dominated by criminal practitioners, the need for the Bar to earn its living was nevertheless uppermost in most people’s minds. Nick Green QC pointed out that the new rules will apply to everyone but one person pointed out that it is the publicly funded Bar, under pressure from HCA’s and Crown advocates, who are more likely to need the permissive authority to compete with solicitors, for example, by bidding to supply legal services through a “procure-co”. Views ranged widely, from those who were uncomfortable about any change to those who favour the end of the “referral profession” by revising the direct access to the client and not to have to rely upon solicitors to do what they have always had a monopoly of doing.
The road shows are likely to be attended by some 700 to 800 barristers in all but the Circuits are encouraged to set up forums to exchange information. Everyone was urged to ask questions and to keep an open mind.
At a packed South Eastern Circuit “road show” on 12 January Baroness Deech, Chair of the Bar Standards Board (“BSB”), described the changes made by the BSB last November to the way in which barristers can supply legal services as “the most important changes in this generation of the Bar”.
She emphasised that she had no wish to preside over fusion and that the decisions were not driven by “the need of the Bar to earn a living”; but rather to permit structures consistent with the principles in the Legal Services Act 2007.
The meeting was only one of several planned in the winter to test the views of the Bar on the way forward while Legal Services Board approval is pending on the proposed amendments to the Code.
Justice system requires urgent attention and next steps on the Harman Review
Q&A with Tim Lynch of Jordan Lynch Private Finance
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Why Virtual Assistants Can Meet the Legal Profession’s Exacting Standards
Despite increased awareness, why are AI hallucinations continuing to infiltrate court cases at an alarming rate? Matthew Lee investigates
Many disabled barristers face entrenched obstacles to KC appointment – both procedural and systemic, writes Diego F Soto-Miranda
The proscribing of Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act is an assault on the English language and on civil liberties, argues Paul Harris SC, founder of the Bar Human Rights Committee
For over three decades, the Bar Mock Trial Competition has boosted the skills, knowledge and confidence of tens of thousands of state school students – as sixth-form teacher Conor Duffy and Young Citizens’ Akasa Pradhan report
Suzie Miller’s latest play puts the legal system centre stage once more. Will it galvanise change? asks Rehna Azim
