*/
Lord Justice Jackson has called for fixed legal costs to apply in all civil claims valued up to £250,000.
Currently, fixed recoverable costs only apply to personal injury claims valued up to £25,000. But the architect of the costs regime introduced by the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, has suggested there should be a fixed cost ‘grid’ for all multi-track cases worth up to £250,000, irrespective of their complexity.
Jackson urged the government to implement the change as a priority and said it could be introduced by the end of the year.
He told the Insolvency Practitioners Association that ‘high litigation costs inhibit access to justice’ and ‘if costs prevent access to justice, this undermines the rule of law’.
But Chairman of the Bar, Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, warned that using the value of a case to determine costs could curtail access to justice, by making it economically unviable to take on complex cases.
‘A low value but legally complex case may demand a great deal more work than the allocated cost band will allow. This means lawyers may not take on complicated, low value cases, thus preventing legitimate claims from being pursued,’ she said.
She warned that the proposal could tilt the litigation playing field further in favour of big business and the state, which may well be willing to spend large sums of money – beyond what is recoverable.
In a separate speech to the Solicitors’ Costs conference, Jackson proposed that the legal profession revisit the idea of setting up a contingent legal aid fund (CLAF) that would operate as a not-for-profit third-party litigation funder to finance ‘ordinary’ litigation as well as ‘deserving’ cases.
The Bar Council backed the suggestion and said it had already opened discussions with CILEx and the Law Society to set up a working group, but said its viability and scope would need to be considered carefully.
Lord Justice Jackson has called for fixed legal costs to apply in all civil claims valued up to £250,000.
Currently, fixed recoverable costs only apply to personal injury claims valued up to £25,000. But the architect of the costs regime introduced by the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, has suggested there should be a fixed cost ‘grid’ for all multi-track cases worth up to £250,000, irrespective of their complexity.
Jackson urged the government to implement the change as a priority and said it could be introduced by the end of the year.
He told the Insolvency Practitioners Association that ‘high litigation costs inhibit access to justice’ and ‘if costs prevent access to justice, this undermines the rule of law’.
But Chairman of the Bar, Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, warned that using the value of a case to determine costs could curtail access to justice, by making it economically unviable to take on complex cases.
‘A low value but legally complex case may demand a great deal more work than the allocated cost band will allow. This means lawyers may not take on complicated, low value cases, thus preventing legitimate claims from being pursued,’ she said.
She warned that the proposal could tilt the litigation playing field further in favour of big business and the state, which may well be willing to spend large sums of money – beyond what is recoverable.
In a separate speech to the Solicitors’ Costs conference, Jackson proposed that the legal profession revisit the idea of setting up a contingent legal aid fund (CLAF) that would operate as a not-for-profit third-party litigation funder to finance ‘ordinary’ litigation as well as ‘deserving’ cases.
The Bar Council backed the suggestion and said it had already opened discussions with CILEx and the Law Society to set up a working group, but said its viability and scope would need to be considered carefully.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier
