*/
More than 500 barristers have criticised the Bar Standards Board’s (BSB’s) training plans.
In an open letter to the BSB Chair, Sir Andrew Burns, QCs, junior barristers and retired judges, including former Lord Chief Justice and Master of the Rolls Lord Woolf, voiced ‘disappointment’ at proposals in Consultation on the Future of Training for the Bar: Future Routes to Authorisation, published in October 2016 and which closed in January.
They said the reforms were ‘not guided by a proper understanding of the BSB’s statutory objective to promote and protect the public interest’, and displayed ‘little comprehension of the practical realities of the profession’.
Blasting the ‘financially crippling’ cost of the BPTC, and disparity in number of students taking it (1,500) compared to the number of puillages on offer each year (430), the letter said that the consultation failed to identify the cause of the current problems, namely that BPTC provision has become a ‘self-serving industry that has vastly outgrown its raison d’être’.
It said the focus should be on ensuring those with a ‘realistic prospect’ of pupillage receive high quality training at the most efficient cost.
The signatories favoured the proposal put forward by the Bar Council and Council of the Inns of Court, for a two-tier process whereby candidates have to pass an online exam before being able to undertake the second, more rigorous, part of the course.
The BSB said it had received a high number of responses and will consider them all before the Board comes to a final decision on the best way forward in the spring.
More than 500 barristers have criticised the Bar Standards Board’s (BSB’s) training plans.
In an open letter to the BSB Chair, Sir Andrew Burns, QCs, junior barristers and retired judges, including former Lord Chief Justice and Master of the Rolls Lord Woolf, voiced ‘disappointment’ at proposals in Consultation on the Future of Training for the Bar: Future Routes to Authorisation, published in October 2016 and which closed in January.
They said the reforms were ‘not guided by a proper understanding of the BSB’s statutory objective to promote and protect the public interest’, and displayed ‘little comprehension of the practical realities of the profession’.
Blasting the ‘financially crippling’ cost of the BPTC, and disparity in number of students taking it (1,500) compared to the number of puillages on offer each year (430), the letter said that the consultation failed to identify the cause of the current problems, namely that BPTC provision has become a ‘self-serving industry that has vastly outgrown its raison d’être’.
It said the focus should be on ensuring those with a ‘realistic prospect’ of pupillage receive high quality training at the most efficient cost.
The signatories favoured the proposal put forward by the Bar Council and Council of the Inns of Court, for a two-tier process whereby candidates have to pass an online exam before being able to undertake the second, more rigorous, part of the course.
The BSB said it had received a high number of responses and will consider them all before the Board comes to a final decision on the best way forward in the spring.
Chair of the Bar finds common ground on legal services between our two jurisdictions, plus an update on jury trials
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Ever wondered what a pupillage is like at the CPS? This Q and A provides an insight into the training, experience and next steps
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today
