*/
SIR Duncan Nichol CBE’s review of the Queen’s Counsel Appointment System was jointly commissioned by the Bar Council and the Law Society in September 2008. The terms of reference of the review included considering whether it would be appropriate to red-affirm the purpose of the award; the forms of excellence that it is intended to recognise; and the range of criteria against which applicants for the award are assessed.
Following the move away from the previously used “soundings” process three years ago, Sir Duncan considered the operation of the new selection process; the business model supporting the selection process and the personnel who will comprise the selection panel in the future. The new process – which is an open and independent competition, undertaken by a selection panel – is sponsored by the Law Society and the Bar Council with the approval of the Lord Chancellor. On 18 December 2008 the Law Society and the Bar Council
received Sir Duncan’s review. The review will now be considered in detail by the General Management Committee of the Bar Council and the [Legal Affairs and Policy Board] of the Law Society.
Commenting on the review Des Hudson, the Chief Executive of the Law Society, said today:
"The Society would like to thank Sir Duncan Nichol for his thorough review of the Queen's Counsel appointments system. The Society will be giving consideration to his report and recommendations. Any system could benefit from improvements to its operation and considering the potential for improvements was a key factor in Sir Duncan's terms of reference. The essential point remains that the current system is infinitely preferable to the former "soundings" behind the scenes which caused concerns over the fairness of the award of Silk in the past. Once we have considered the report we will be discussing it with the Bar and our members before confirming our decisions."
Commenting on the review, the Chief Executive of the Bar Council, David Hobart, said today:
“The review of the Queen’s Counsel appointment system is of great interest to both branches of the legal profession, its clients and the judiciary. The current system enjoys the confidence of a wide range of interested parties and ensures that ‘QC’ remains a symbol of excellence recognised the world over. The Bar Council is keen to ensure that the QC marque is not diluted, and has made suggestions to this effect to Sir Duncan in the preparation of his report. Once the Bar Council and the Law Society have had the chance to consider the report, we expect to comment further.”
Commenting on the review Des Hudson, the Chief Executive of the Law Society, said today:
"The Society would like to thank Sir Duncan Nichol for his thorough review of the Queen's Counsel appointments system. The Society will be giving consideration to his report and recommendations. Any system could benefit from improvements to its operation and considering the potential for improvements was a key factor in Sir Duncan's terms of reference. The essential point remains that the current system is infinitely preferable to the former "soundings" behind the scenes which caused concerns over the fairness of the award of Silk in the past. Once we have considered the report we will be discussing it with the Bar and our members before confirming our decisions."
Commenting on the review, the Chief Executive of the Bar Council, David Hobart, said today:
“The review of the Queen’s Counsel appointment system is of great interest to both branches of the legal profession, its clients and the judiciary. The current system enjoys the confidence of a wide range of interested parties and ensures that ‘QC’ remains a symbol of excellence recognised the world over. The Bar Council is keen to ensure that the QC marque is not diluted, and has made suggestions to this effect to Sir Duncan in the preparation of his report. Once the Bar Council and the Law Society have had the chance to consider the report, we expect to comment further.”
SIR Duncan Nichol CBE’s review of the Queen’s Counsel Appointment System was jointly commissioned by the Bar Council and the Law Society in September 2008. The terms of reference of the review included considering whether it would be appropriate to red-affirm the purpose of the award; the forms of excellence that it is intended to recognise; and the range of criteria against which applicants for the award are assessed.
Following the move away from the previously used “soundings” process three years ago, Sir Duncan considered the operation of the new selection process; the business model supporting the selection process and the personnel who will comprise the selection panel in the future. The new process – which is an open and independent competition, undertaken by a selection panel – is sponsored by the Law Society and the Bar Council with the approval of the Lord Chancellor. On 18 December 2008 the Law Society and the Bar Council
received Sir Duncan’s review. The review will now be considered in detail by the General Management Committee of the Bar Council and the [Legal Affairs and Policy Board] of the Law Society.
The beginning of the legal year offers the opportunity for a renewed commitment to justice and the rule of law both at home and abroad
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
Providing bespoke mortgage and protection solutions for barristers
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
Yasmin Ilhan explains the Law Commission’s proposals for a quicker, easier and more effective contempt of court regime
Irresponsible use of AI can lead to serious and embarrassing consequences. Sam Thomas briefs barristers on the five key risks and how to avoid them
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series
