*/
Barristers will be told that non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) must not be used to cover up offences that should be reported to the police or regulator.
The Bar Standards Board (BSB) is set to issue guidance for barristers on the use of NDAs in cases of alleged sexual harassment. A spokesperson told Counsel that the guidance will state that the use of NDAs is inappropriate if it seeks to prevent the reporting of matters that are disclosable to regulatory or law enforcement bodies or under the Public Interest Disclosure Act, and that they should not be used to ‘threaten, intimidate or deter’ someone from making a proper disclosure.
In updated guidance regarding the reporting of serious misconduct of others, the regulator made it clear that enforcement will not be taken against barristers who fail to report discrimination, harassment or victimisation where they have been the subject of the misconduct. The BSB is also piloting a scheme to grant a waiver from the duty to report for barristers trained to advise and support others.
Figures released in the regulator’s annual Enforcement Report showed that there were eight reports of sexual harassment by barristers in 2016-17, while there had been none in the previous year.
The report showed that the number of complaints against barristers had risen by nearly 30% over the past year to 475 – the highest number of new complaints opened in any year since 2013-14 – and reports of serious misconduct had risen to 133 from 110. However, the number of barristers disbarred fell to six from 20.
Barristers will be told that non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) must not be used to cover up offences that should be reported to the police or regulator.
The Bar Standards Board (BSB) is set to issue guidance for barristers on the use of NDAs in cases of alleged sexual harassment. A spokesperson told Counsel that the guidance will state that the use of NDAs is inappropriate if it seeks to prevent the reporting of matters that are disclosable to regulatory or law enforcement bodies or under the Public Interest Disclosure Act, and that they should not be used to ‘threaten, intimidate or deter’ someone from making a proper disclosure.
In updated guidance regarding the reporting of serious misconduct of others, the regulator made it clear that enforcement will not be taken against barristers who fail to report discrimination, harassment or victimisation where they have been the subject of the misconduct. The BSB is also piloting a scheme to grant a waiver from the duty to report for barristers trained to advise and support others.
Figures released in the regulator’s annual Enforcement Report showed that there were eight reports of sexual harassment by barristers in 2016-17, while there had been none in the previous year.
The report showed that the number of complaints against barristers had risen by nearly 30% over the past year to 475 – the highest number of new complaints opened in any year since 2013-14 – and reports of serious misconduct had risen to 133 from 110. However, the number of barristers disbarred fell to six from 20.
Chair of the Bar finds common ground on legal services between our two jurisdictions, plus an update on jury trials
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Ever wondered what a pupillage is like at the CPS? This Q and A provides an insight into the training, experience and next steps
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today
