*/
More than 400 complaints were made against barristers last year, with one in ten concerning two members from the same chambers, the annual enforcement report from the Bar Standards Board revealed.
A total of 433 complaints were opened in 2015/16, a 2% fall on the previous year. Of those, 299 were external complaints, received from clients, members of the public, solicitors or other professionals and organisations. The most common allegations were failing to cooperate with the Legal Ombudsman (17%) and discreditable or dishonest conduct (18%).
There were 134 complaints raised by the BSB itself, for breaches of the Handbook.
The report showed that two barristers at one unnamed set accounted for 48 (11%) of all new complaints raised in 2015/16.
Elsewhere in the report, 79% of barristers agreed that the enforcement process was open and fair and only 8% disagreed. But for complainants, 69% disagreed that the process was fair and open and only 14% agreed.
Of the complainants, 69% felt that the BSB had not considered all of the evidence relating to their complaint and 63% disagreed that the reasons for the final outcome were clear.
A BSB spokesperson said: ‘Satisfaction rates correlate with outcomes. There is a high proportion of external complaints which we dismiss, or do not result in a disciplinary tribunal.’ The BSB said it will continue to work with complainants to inform them and manage expectations.
More than 400 complaints were made against barristers last year, with one in ten concerning two members from the same chambers, the annual enforcement report from the Bar Standards Board revealed.
A total of 433 complaints were opened in 2015/16, a 2% fall on the previous year. Of those, 299 were external complaints, received from clients, members of the public, solicitors or other professionals and organisations. The most common allegations were failing to cooperate with the Legal Ombudsman (17%) and discreditable or dishonest conduct (18%).
There were 134 complaints raised by the BSB itself, for breaches of the Handbook.
The report showed that two barristers at one unnamed set accounted for 48 (11%) of all new complaints raised in 2015/16.
Elsewhere in the report, 79% of barristers agreed that the enforcement process was open and fair and only 8% disagreed. But for complainants, 69% disagreed that the process was fair and open and only 14% agreed.
Of the complainants, 69% felt that the BSB had not considered all of the evidence relating to their complaint and 63% disagreed that the reasons for the final outcome were clear.
A BSB spokesperson said: ‘Satisfaction rates correlate with outcomes. There is a high proportion of external complaints which we dismiss, or do not result in a disciplinary tribunal.’ The BSB said it will continue to work with complainants to inform them and manage expectations.
Chair of the Bar finds common ground on legal services between our two jurisdictions, plus an update on jury trials
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Ever wondered what a pupillage is like at the CPS? This Q and A provides an insight into the training, experience and next steps
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today