*/
Chambers should be put back in charge of designing the pupillage experience for aspiring barristers, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) has said.
In Future Bar Training, published in February, the regulator suggested that it should instead focus on ensuring that barristers have the right knowledge and skills at the end of the educational process, through the establishment of a Professional Statement.
The proposals, which are due to be consulted on this summer, mark a significant departure from the current system in which the BSB must approve any pupillages that deviate from the standard format, and make it easier for pupillage training organisations to offer alternatives, such as secondments. The BSB will also explore how pupils – most of whom are self-employed – can be protected in the same way as employees or other trainees.
Director of Education and Training for the BSB, Dr Simon Thornton-Wood, said: “By clearly defining the end point of qualification – in terms of the skills and ability a barrister needs – we think routes to qualification will become more flexible, more innovative, and more creative.
“If this greater flexibility means that there can be more pupillages on offer that is also a good move.”
The increasing costs in training and education is a serious concern. “Inevitably, high quality training comes at a price, but we don’t want this to be prohibitive and a deterrent to those who have the aptitude and determination to become successful barristers,” Thornton-Wood added.
The cost of the BPTC in London is now typically in excess of £17,500 for a one-year course; and less than a third of students find work at the Bar.
The proposals, which are due to be consulted on this summer, mark a significant departure from the current system in which the BSB must approve any pupillages that deviate from the standard format, and make it easier for pupillage training organisations to offer alternatives, such as secondments. The BSB will also explore how pupils – most of whom are self-employed – can be protected in the same way as employees or other trainees.
Director of Education and Training for the BSB, Dr Simon Thornton-Wood, said: “By clearly defining the end point of qualification – in terms of the skills and ability a barrister needs – we think routes to qualification will become more flexible, more innovative, and more creative.
“If this greater flexibility means that there can be more pupillages on offer that is also a good move.”
The increasing costs in training and education is a serious concern. “Inevitably, high quality training comes at a price, but we don’t want this to be prohibitive and a deterrent to those who have the aptitude and determination to become successful barristers,” Thornton-Wood added.
The cost of the BPTC in London is now typically in excess of £17,500 for a one-year course; and less than a third of students find work at the Bar.
Chambers should be put back in charge of designing the pupillage experience for aspiring barristers, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) has said.
In Future Bar Training, published in February, the regulator suggested that it should instead focus on ensuring that barristers have the right knowledge and skills at the end of the educational process, through the establishment of a Professional Statement.
Chair of the Bar reflects on 2025
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
Revolt Cycling in Holborn, London’s first sustainable fitness studio, invites barristers to join the revolution – turning pedal power into clean energy
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, reflects on how the company’s Giving Back ethos continues to make a difference to communities across the UK
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Professor Dominic Regan and Seán Jones KC present their best buys for this holiday season
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Six months of court observation at the Old Bailey: APPEAL’s Dr Nisha Waller and Tehreem Sultan report their findings on prosecution practices under joint enterprise
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum disorder remains poorly understood in the criminal justice system. Does Alex Henry’s joint enterprise conviction expose the need to audit prisons? asks Dr Felicity Gerry KC
With automation now deeply embedded in the Department for Work Pensions, Alexander McColl and Alexa Thompson review what we know, what we don’t and avenues for legal challenge
