*/
THE Bar Council has voiced its concerns over government plans to cut legal aid for vulnerable children and families, saying that cuts of between 20% and 30% being proposed by the Ministry of Justice would risk miscarriages of family justice.
The warning, supported by a statement from the leading children’s charity the NSPCC, follows a recent report from the Family Law Bar Association, which found that expert family barristers are being driven away from their work to represent the interests of vulnerable women and children as a result of repeated cuts in legal aid pay.
The study, by Dr Debora Price and Anne Laybourne of King’s College London’s King’s Institute for the Study of Public Policy examined in detail over 5,000 cases undertaken by more than 1,600 barristers.
The Work of the Family Bar paints a picture of a profession close to breaking point as it struggles to cope with increasingly complex caseloads, the pressure to protect the interests of vulnerable clients, disruptive patterns of work and repeated, demoralising cuts in pay.
Desmond Browne QC, Chairman of the Bar Council, said: ‘Government cuts in funding are driving skilled advocates out of publicly funded family work, leaving the most vulnerable in society at risk of serious miscarriages of justice and abuse. No child should be hazarded in this way.
The deep commitment of family barristers, many of whom are working at breaking point, has for too long been taken for granted. We naturally welcome the fact that children’s charities are now supporting our arguments. Hopefully the Government will now start to take notice of what the public interest requires. Barristers should not be asked to do family work at rates which are uneconomic, and which will hit women and BME practitioners especially hard.’
The study, by Dr Debora Price and Anne Laybourne of King’s College London’s King’s Institute for the Study of Public Policy examined in detail over 5,000 cases undertaken by more than 1,600 barristers.
The Work of the Family Bar paints a picture of a profession close to breaking point as it struggles to cope with increasingly complex caseloads, the pressure to protect the interests of vulnerable clients, disruptive patterns of work and repeated, demoralising cuts in pay.
Desmond Browne QC, Chairman of the Bar Council, said: ‘Government cuts in funding are driving skilled advocates out of publicly funded family work, leaving the most vulnerable in society at risk of serious miscarriages of justice and abuse. No child should be hazarded in this way.
The deep commitment of family barristers, many of whom are working at breaking point, has for too long been taken for granted. We naturally welcome the fact that children’s charities are now supporting our arguments. Hopefully the Government will now start to take notice of what the public interest requires. Barristers should not be asked to do family work at rates which are uneconomic, and which will hit women and BME practitioners especially hard.’
THE Bar Council has voiced its concerns over government plans to cut legal aid for vulnerable children and families, saying that cuts of between 20% and 30% being proposed by the Ministry of Justice would risk miscarriages of family justice.
The warning, supported by a statement from the leading children’s charity the NSPCC, follows a recent report from the Family Law Bar Association, which found that expert family barristers are being driven away from their work to represent the interests of vulnerable women and children as a result of repeated cuts in legal aid pay.
Justice system requires urgent attention and next steps on the Harman Review
Q&A with Tim Lynch of Jordan Lynch Private Finance
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Why Virtual Assistants Can Meet the Legal Profession’s Exacting Standards
Despite increased awareness, why are AI hallucinations continuing to infiltrate court cases at an alarming rate? Matthew Lee investigates
Many disabled barristers face entrenched obstacles to KC appointment – both procedural and systemic, writes Diego F Soto-Miranda
The proscribing of Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act is an assault on the English language and on civil liberties, argues Paul Harris SC, founder of the Bar Human Rights Committee
For over three decades, the Bar Mock Trial Competition has boosted the skills, knowledge and confidence of tens of thousands of state school students – as sixth-form teacher Conor Duffy and Young Citizens’ Akasa Pradhan report
Suzie Miller’s latest play puts the legal system centre stage once more. Will it galvanise change? asks Rehna Azim
