*/
Lord Justice Moses has called for reform of the role of the judge in jury trials.
Delivering this year’s Law Reform Committee lecture “Summing Down the Summing Up: Re-Forming the Criminal Trial” on 23 November at the Inner Temple, Moses LJ said there was a problem in the function of the judge and his role as guide when summing-up. Instead, he said, the jury should be given a list of questions to answer.
This proposal was put forward by Lord Justice Auld in his October 2001 Review of the Criminal Courts.
Moses LJ argued: “Defence counsel should be required to tell the jury what the defence is at the outset. But that does not go nearly far enough ... the factual issues should be debated in court by counsel, resolved by the judge and the issues in the form of questions written down before speeches to the jury.
“The jury will have heard warnings as to how to approach particular types of evidence, when the evidence is called, and can be reminded of those directions in a short note, annexed to the list of witnesses, each of whom will be linked to the issues and questions to which their evidence relates,” he said.
“The reforms are cheap, will save money and be cost effective. A criminal trial costs about £4,300, a day and £7,000 a day at the Old Bailey. Summings-up regularly last a day in trials lasting more than two weeks: there were 389 of such trials in the year to April 2010.
“£4,000 or even £7,000 is an expensive ticket to listen to a replay of the drama delivered in monotone. The judges’ summing-up is a frequent source of appeals against conviction. Conviction appeals cost about £14,000 day.”
This proposal was put forward by Lord Justice Auld in his October 2001 Review of the Criminal Courts.
Moses LJ argued: “Defence counsel should be required to tell the jury what the defence is at the outset. But that does not go nearly far enough ... the factual issues should be debated in court by counsel, resolved by the judge and the issues in the form of questions written down before speeches to the jury.
“The jury will have heard warnings as to how to approach particular types of evidence, when the evidence is called, and can be reminded of those directions in a short note, annexed to the list of witnesses, each of whom will be linked to the issues and questions to which their evidence relates,” he said.
“The reforms are cheap, will save money and be cost effective. A criminal trial costs about £4,300, a day and £7,000 a day at the Old Bailey. Summings-up regularly last a day in trials lasting more than two weeks: there were 389 of such trials in the year to April 2010.
“£4,000 or even £7,000 is an expensive ticket to listen to a replay of the drama delivered in monotone. The judges’ summing-up is a frequent source of appeals against conviction. Conviction appeals cost about £14,000 day.”
Lord Justice Moses has called for reform of the role of the judge in jury trials.
Delivering this year’s Law Reform Committee lecture “Summing Down the Summing Up: Re-Forming the Criminal Trial” on 23 November at the Inner Temple, Moses LJ said there was a problem in the function of the judge and his role as guide when summing-up. Instead, he said, the jury should be given a list of questions to answer.
The beginning of the legal year offers the opportunity for a renewed commitment to justice and the rule of law both at home and abroad
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
Providing bespoke mortgage and protection solutions for barristers
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
Yasmin Ilhan explains the Law Commission’s proposals for a quicker, easier and more effective contempt of court regime
Irresponsible use of AI can lead to serious and embarrassing consequences. Sam Thomas briefs barristers on the five key risks and how to avoid them
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series
