*/
The Ministry of Justice has been fined £180,000 for repeated data security failings over confidential information on prisoners and victims of crime.
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) served the penalty following the loss of a back-up hard drive at HMP Erlestoke prison in Wiltshire in May 2013, which contained information on 2,935 prisoners, including links to organised crime, health, drug misuse and material about victims and visitors.
The device was not encrypted. The incident followed a similar case in October 2011, when the ICO was alerted to the loss of another unencrypted hard drive containing the details of 16,000 prisoners at HMP High Down prison in Surrey. In May 2012 the prison service provided new hard drives to all prisons still backing-up data in this way, but without instructing that the encryption option should be turned on. ICO Head of Enforcement, Stephen Eckersley, said: “The fact that a government department with security oversight for prisons can supply equipment to 75 prisons throughout England and Wales without properly understanding, let alone telling them, how to use it beggars belief.”
The MOJ, working with the National Offenders and Management Service, has now taken action to ensure all hard drives used by prisons are securely encrypted. Separately, a paralegal has been prosecuted by the ICO under s 55 of the Data Protection Act for illegally taking the sensitive information of over 100 people before leaving for a rival firm. The information, which included workload lists, file notes and template documents, was contained in six emails sent in the weeks before the paralegal left the firm. He was fined £300, ordered to pay a £30 victim surcharge and £438.63 prosecution costs.
The device was not encrypted. The incident followed a similar case in October 2011, when the ICO was alerted to the loss of another unencrypted hard drive containing the details of 16,000 prisoners at HMP High Down prison in Surrey. In May 2012 the prison service provided new hard drives to all prisons still backing-up data in this way, but without instructing that the encryption option should be turned on. ICO Head of Enforcement, Stephen Eckersley, said: “The fact that a government department with security oversight for prisons can supply equipment to 75 prisons throughout England and Wales without properly understanding, let alone telling them, how to use it beggars belief.”
The MOJ, working with the National Offenders and Management Service, has now taken action to ensure all hard drives used by prisons are securely encrypted. Separately, a paralegal has been prosecuted by the ICO under s 55 of the Data Protection Act for illegally taking the sensitive information of over 100 people before leaving for a rival firm. The information, which included workload lists, file notes and template documents, was contained in six emails sent in the weeks before the paralegal left the firm. He was fined £300, ordered to pay a £30 victim surcharge and £438.63 prosecution costs.
The Ministry of Justice has been fined £180,000 for repeated data security failings over confidential information on prisoners and victims of crime.
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) served the penalty following the loss of a back-up hard drive at HMP Erlestoke prison in Wiltshire in May 2013, which contained information on 2,935 prisoners, including links to organised crime, health, drug misuse and material about victims and visitors.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier
