*/
Barristers will be able to refuse work where there is an “unacceptable risk” that they will be not be paid, after the Legal Services Board (LSB) approved plans submitted to it by the Bar Standards Board (BSB).
The reform removes from the BSB’s rules the statement that the cab rank does not apply if a solicitor is on the list of defaulting solicitors. BSB guidance states that the list can provide evidence that a solicitor poses a non-payment risk. The Bar Council will therefore continue to maintain it.
In the decision notice, the LSB’s chief executive, Richard Moriarty, welcomed the removal of the list from the BSB’s rules.
He said it “risks compromising” the BSB’s regulatory independence and he predicted that the new provisions “may widen the circumstances in which barristers can refuse a client”.
Before refusing work, barristers will be expected to consider alternatives, such as obtaining payment in advance or using a third party payment service.
The change followed a review by the BSB of the decision to retain the existing cab rank rule following the introduction of standard contractual terms between barristers and solicitors in 2013.
The BSB reviewed the regime after an LSB investigation found the Bar Council had interfered with the BSB’s independence in relation to the controversial contract and cab rank changes.
Commenting, BSB director of regulatory policy, Ewen MacLeod, said, “We are pleased that the Legal Services Board has approved our changes to the regulatory arrangements relating to the cab rank rule,” which came into effect from 2 September.
Barristers will be able to refuse work where there is an “unacceptable risk” that they will be not be paid, after the Legal Services Board (LSB) approved plans submitted to it by the Bar Standards Board (BSB).
The reform removes from the BSB’s rules the statement that the cab rank does not apply if a solicitor is on the list of defaulting solicitors. BSB guidance states that the list can provide evidence that a solicitor poses a non-payment risk. The Bar Council will therefore continue to maintain it.
In the decision notice, the LSB’s chief executive, Richard Moriarty, welcomed the removal of the list from the BSB’s rules.
He said it “risks compromising” the BSB’s regulatory independence and he predicted that the new provisions “may widen the circumstances in which barristers can refuse a client”.
Before refusing work, barristers will be expected to consider alternatives, such as obtaining payment in advance or using a third party payment service.
The change followed a review by the BSB of the decision to retain the existing cab rank rule following the introduction of standard contractual terms between barristers and solicitors in 2013.
The BSB reviewed the regime after an LSB investigation found the Bar Council had interfered with the BSB’s independence in relation to the controversial contract and cab rank changes.
Commenting, BSB director of regulatory policy, Ewen MacLeod, said, “We are pleased that the Legal Services Board has approved our changes to the regulatory arrangements relating to the cab rank rule,” which came into effect from 2 September.
Chair of the Bar sets out a busy calendar for the rest of the year
Why Virtual Assistants Can Meet the Legal Profession’s Exacting Standards
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Examined by Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
Time is precious for barristers. Every moment spent chasing paperwork, organising diaries, or managing admin is time taken away from what matters most: preparation, advocacy and your clients. That’s where Eden Assistants step in
AlphaBiolabs has announced its latest Giving Back donation to RAY Ceredigion, a grassroots West Wales charity that provides play, learning and community opportunities for families across Ceredigion County
Despite increased awareness, why are AI hallucinations continuing to infiltrate court cases at an alarming rate? Matthew Lee investigates
Many disabled barristers face entrenched obstacles to KC appointment – both procedural and systemic, writes Diego F Soto-Miranda
The proscribing of Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act is an assault on the English language and on civil liberties, argues Paul Harris SC, founder of the Bar Human Rights Committee
For over three decades, the Bar Mock Trial Competition has boosted the skills, knowledge and confidence of tens of thousands of state school students – as sixth-form teacher Conor Duffy and Young Citizens’ Akasa Pradhan report
Suzie Miller’s latest play puts the legal system centre stage once more. Will it galvanise change? asks Rehna Azim
.tmb-carlisting.png?sfvrsn=c60e2f3d_1){kind=logo}
