*/
Barristers will be able to refuse work where there is an “unacceptable risk” that they will be not be paid, after the Legal Services Board (LSB) approved plans submitted to it by the Bar Standards Board (BSB).
The reform removes from the BSB’s rules the statement that the cab rank does not apply if a solicitor is on the list of defaulting solicitors. BSB guidance states that the list can provide evidence that a solicitor poses a non-payment risk. The Bar Council will therefore continue to maintain it.
In the decision notice, the LSB’s chief executive, Richard Moriarty, welcomed the removal of the list from the BSB’s rules.
He said it “risks compromising” the BSB’s regulatory independence and he predicted that the new provisions “may widen the circumstances in which barristers can refuse a client”.
Before refusing work, barristers will be expected to consider alternatives, such as obtaining payment in advance or using a third party payment service.
The change followed a review by the BSB of the decision to retain the existing cab rank rule following the introduction of standard contractual terms between barristers and solicitors in 2013.
The BSB reviewed the regime after an LSB investigation found the Bar Council had interfered with the BSB’s independence in relation to the controversial contract and cab rank changes.
Commenting, BSB director of regulatory policy, Ewen MacLeod, said, “We are pleased that the Legal Services Board has approved our changes to the regulatory arrangements relating to the cab rank rule,” which came into effect from 2 September.
Barristers will be able to refuse work where there is an “unacceptable risk” that they will be not be paid, after the Legal Services Board (LSB) approved plans submitted to it by the Bar Standards Board (BSB).
The reform removes from the BSB’s rules the statement that the cab rank does not apply if a solicitor is on the list of defaulting solicitors. BSB guidance states that the list can provide evidence that a solicitor poses a non-payment risk. The Bar Council will therefore continue to maintain it.
In the decision notice, the LSB’s chief executive, Richard Moriarty, welcomed the removal of the list from the BSB’s rules.
He said it “risks compromising” the BSB’s regulatory independence and he predicted that the new provisions “may widen the circumstances in which barristers can refuse a client”.
Before refusing work, barristers will be expected to consider alternatives, such as obtaining payment in advance or using a third party payment service.
The change followed a review by the BSB of the decision to retain the existing cab rank rule following the introduction of standard contractual terms between barristers and solicitors in 2013.
The BSB reviewed the regime after an LSB investigation found the Bar Council had interfered with the BSB’s independence in relation to the controversial contract and cab rank changes.
Commenting, BSB director of regulatory policy, Ewen MacLeod, said, “We are pleased that the Legal Services Board has approved our changes to the regulatory arrangements relating to the cab rank rule,” which came into effect from 2 September.
Chair of the Bar reflects on 2025
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
Revolt Cycling in Holborn, London’s first sustainable fitness studio, invites barristers to join the revolution – turning pedal power into clean energy
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, reflects on how the company’s Giving Back ethos continues to make a difference to communities across the UK
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Professor Dominic Regan and Seán Jones KC present their best buys for this holiday season
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Six months of court observation at the Old Bailey: APPEAL’s Dr Nisha Waller and Tehreem Sultan report their findings on prosecution practices under joint enterprise
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum disorder remains poorly understood in the criminal justice system. Does Alex Henry’s joint enterprise conviction expose the need to audit prisons? asks Dr Felicity Gerry KC
With automation now deeply embedded in the Department for Work Pensions, Alexander McColl and Alexa Thompson review what we know, what we don’t and avenues for legal challenge
