*/
Calls for Royal Commission to examine consitutional framework
It is time for a close look at the British constitution, the Master of the Rolls has said.
In a speech to the Law Commission in December, “Law reform—where will it all end?”, Lord Neuberger encouraged the Commissioners to make constitutional law their next subject of examination. This could be done by a special Commission or Royal Commission, he said.
This did not mean he advocated a written constitution, he said, but that the existing unwritten constitution was undergoing a period of change.
Further reform of the House of Lords is a “live issue”, he said, “not least in the light of its ever increasing size at a time when the smaller House of Commons is apparently engaged on down-sizing”.
Referring to the Hunting Act case, R (Jackson) v HM Attorney-General, he said: “The dicta in Jackson indicate that there is a strong judicial view that an important aspect of our fundamental law is changing; that parliamentary supremacy may be eroding ... But that raises the question, if Parliament is not sovereign, what is?”
Given the rate of constitutional evolution, he said, it had “become increasingly imperative that we engage a Royal Commission to examine our constitutional framework. Constitutional clarity is of fundamental importance”.
In a speech to the Law Commission in December, “Law reform—where will it all end?”, Lord Neuberger encouraged the Commissioners to make constitutional law their next subject of examination. This could be done by a special Commission or Royal Commission, he said.
This did not mean he advocated a written constitution, he said, but that the existing unwritten constitution was undergoing a period of change.
Further reform of the House of Lords is a “live issue”, he said, “not least in the light of its ever increasing size at a time when the smaller House of Commons is apparently engaged on down-sizing”.
Referring to the Hunting Act case, R (Jackson) v HM Attorney-General, he said: “The dicta in Jackson indicate that there is a strong judicial view that an important aspect of our fundamental law is changing; that parliamentary supremacy may be eroding ... But that raises the question, if Parliament is not sovereign, what is?”
Given the rate of constitutional evolution, he said, it had “become increasingly imperative that we engage a Royal Commission to examine our constitutional framework. Constitutional clarity is of fundamental importance”.
Calls for Royal Commission to examine consitutional framework
It is time for a close look at the British constitution, the Master of the Rolls has said.
Justice system requires urgent attention and next steps on the Harman Review
Q&A with Tim Lynch of Jordan Lynch Private Finance
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Why Virtual Assistants Can Meet the Legal Profession’s Exacting Standards
Despite increased awareness, why are AI hallucinations continuing to infiltrate court cases at an alarming rate? Matthew Lee investigates
Many disabled barristers face entrenched obstacles to KC appointment – both procedural and systemic, writes Diego F Soto-Miranda
The proscribing of Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act is an assault on the English language and on civil liberties, argues Paul Harris SC, founder of the Bar Human Rights Committee
For over three decades, the Bar Mock Trial Competition has boosted the skills, knowledge and confidence of tens of thousands of state school students – as sixth-form teacher Conor Duffy and Young Citizens’ Akasa Pradhan report
Suzie Miller’s latest play puts the legal system centre stage once more. Will it galvanise change? asks Rehna Azim
