*/
Senior judges have spoken out on the plight of litigants in person (LIPs) and the “hidden additional burden” the judiciary shoulders.
Lord Dyson, giving evidence to the Justice Committee Inquiry on the impact of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 on 1 December, said: “It is impossible to prove but it would be extraordinary, frankly, if there were not some cases that are decided adversely to a LIP which would have been decided the other way had that LIP been represented by a competent lawyer. It is inevitable.”
“Experimental” statistics recently published by the Government have shown that the length of hearings with LIPs are no longer, on average, than where parties are represented. But Lord Dyson explained: “[This] is because, I am afraid, that very often litigants in person are totally overawed by the experience and they just dry up... frankly, they freeze.”
Problems are front-loaded at the pre-hearing and case-management stage – “where, if you have lawyers present, they are used to narrowing the issues” – and the additional burden falls to judges. “You would be surprised at how many times people come to court with the proverbial plastic bag – you cannot assume that you are not missing something unless you read every single page,” he said. The support of pro bono advocates to judges is invaluable but the whole system cannot “run on that basis”.
Sir James Munby, also giving evidence, agreed that hearings are taking longer in the early stages of family cases. “The big, big problem... is the absence of pre-litigation and pre-hearing advice,” he said. “Managing expectations is something traditionally done by the lawyers, but is now also being done by the judges” and “that is not something captured by the Government statistics”.
“Experimental” statistics recently published by the Government have shown that the length of hearings with LIPs are no longer, on average, than where parties are represented. But Lord Dyson explained: “[This] is because, I am afraid, that very often litigants in person are totally overawed by the experience and they just dry up... frankly, they freeze.”
Problems are front-loaded at the pre-hearing and case-management stage – “where, if you have lawyers present, they are used to narrowing the issues” – and the additional burden falls to judges. “You would be surprised at how many times people come to court with the proverbial plastic bag – you cannot assume that you are not missing something unless you read every single page,” he said. The support of pro bono advocates to judges is invaluable but the whole system cannot “run on that basis”.
Sir James Munby, also giving evidence, agreed that hearings are taking longer in the early stages of family cases. “The big, big problem... is the absence of pre-litigation and pre-hearing advice,” he said. “Managing expectations is something traditionally done by the lawyers, but is now also being done by the judges” and “that is not something captured by the Government statistics”.
Senior judges have spoken out on the plight of litigants in person (LIPs) and the “hidden additional burden” the judiciary shoulders.
Lord Dyson, giving evidence to the Justice Committee Inquiry on the impact of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 on 1 December, said: “It is impossible to prove but it would be extraordinary, frankly, if there were not some cases that are decided adversely to a LIP which would have been decided the other way had that LIP been represented by a competent lawyer. It is inevitable.”
Efforts continue on gender equality, support for the Bar, meaningful reform for the sector and advocating for the rule of law
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Leading drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Beatson Cancer Charity in Glasgow as part of its Giving Back campaign
Girls Human Rights Festival 2025: a global gathering for change
Exclusive Q&A with Henry Dannell
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
Patrick Green KC talks about the landmark Post Office Group litigation and his driving principles for life and practice. Interview by Anthony Inglese CB
Desiree Artesi meets Malcolm Bishop KC, the Lord Chief Justice of Tonga, who talks about his new role in the South Pacific and reflects on his career
Sir Nicholas Mostyn, former High Court judge, on starting a hit podcast with fellow ‘Parkies’ after the shock of his diagnosis
Once you submit your silk application, what happens next? Sir Paul Morgan explains each stage of the process and reflects on his experience as a member of the KC Selection Panel