*/
Plans to cut conditional fee agreements (“CFA”) success fees for libel cases by up to 90 per cent have been dropped owing to lack of Parliamentary time.
The controversial plans, which were opposed by many claimant libel lawyers, would have capped the success fee chargeable in CFAs from a maximum 100 per cent to ten per cent. The reforms had previously failed to pass the committee stage in the House of Commons after four labour MPs joined opposition parties to vote it down.
Claimant libel lawyers have criticised the reduction to a ten per cent success fee on the basis that solicitors would be unable to bear the risk of bringing many otherwise deserving cases. They say that in practice the lawyer never recovers the full costs involved.
They have also pointed out that the risk is staged, with the 100 per cent success fee only applying at trial and most cases settling at an early stage in proceedings. This has the benefit that lawyers need carefully to assess the risks involved at every stage.
The Law Society has called for substantial research and consultation before any further proposals are put before Parliament. Robert Heslett, President of the Law Society, said: “Attempting to rush legislation, delegated or otherwise, through Parliament fails to consider the impact it can have.”
All three of the main parties have pledged to reform the libel laws after the general election.
Claimant libel lawyers have criticised the reduction to a ten per cent success fee on the basis that solicitors would be unable to bear the risk of bringing many otherwise deserving cases. They say that in practice the lawyer never recovers the full costs involved.
They have also pointed out that the risk is staged, with the 100 per cent success fee only applying at trial and most cases settling at an early stage in proceedings. This has the benefit that lawyers need carefully to assess the risks involved at every stage.
The Law Society has called for substantial research and consultation before any further proposals are put before Parliament. Robert Heslett, President of the Law Society, said: “Attempting to rush legislation, delegated or otherwise, through Parliament fails to consider the impact it can have.”
All three of the main parties have pledged to reform the libel laws after the general election.
Plans to cut conditional fee agreements (“CFA”) success fees for libel cases by up to 90 per cent have been dropped owing to lack of Parliamentary time.
The controversial plans, which were opposed by many claimant libel lawyers, would have capped the success fee chargeable in CFAs from a maximum 100 per cent to ten per cent. The reforms had previously failed to pass the committee stage in the House of Commons after four labour MPs joined opposition parties to vote it down.
Kirsty Brimelow KC, Chair of the Bar, sets our course for 2026
What meaningful steps can you take in 2026 to advance your legal career? asks Thomas Cowan of St Pauls Chambers
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, explains why drugs may appear in test results, despite the donor denying use of them
Asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
AlphaBiolabs has donated £500 to The Christie Charity through its Giving Back initiative, helping to support cancer care, treatment and research across Greater Manchester, Cheshire and further afield
Q and A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today
With pupillage application season under way, Laura Wright reflects on her route to ‘tech barrister’ and offers advice for those aiming at a career at the Bar
Jury-less trial proposals threaten fairness, legitimacy and democracy without ending the backlog, writes Professor Cheryl Thomas KC (Hon), the UK’s leading expert on juries, judges and courts
Are you ready for the new way to do tax returns? David Southern KC explains the biggest change since HMRC launched self-assessment more than 30 years ago... and its impact on the Bar
Marking one year since a Bar disciplinary tribunal dismissed all charges against her, Dr Charlotte Proudman discusses the experience, her formative years and next steps. Interview by Anthony Inglese CB
