*/
A cross-party group of MPs has condemned the Legal Services Commission (“LSC”) proposals to cut legal aid funds for family law cases as “flawed, weak and inflexible”.
The LSC is proposing a new fixed fee scheme for advocacy work in private law and care proceedings. Legal aid minister, Lord Bach, has said the LSC’s response to the consultation will be announced before Parliament rises on 21 July.
A report by the Justice Select Committee, however, published on 15 July, has concluded the reforms were based on “incomplete data, [and] a superficial understanding of the supply of legal services in this area”. It criticised the LSC’s “conclusions first, evidence after” approach to policy-making, having commissioned Ernst and Young to gather data after it had proposed cuts to the system.
Desmond Browne QC, Chairman of the Bar, said: “This is a simply devastating condemnation of the LSC’s hapless efforts at reform.
“It shows that it is not practitioners who have pushed up the cost of legal aid. The Committee has confirmed our warning that there is a serious risk of an exodus of experienced practitioners from publicly-funded family law practice.”
Lucy Theis QC, chair of the Family Law Bar Association, said: “Surely now the LSC will wake up to reality: its plans for family legal aid are unwelcome, unworkable and unwanted. “On reading this report, Justice Ministers will realise that the LSC has failed a basic test of competence when it comes to delivering reform.”
A spokesperson for the LSC commented: “We are grateful to the Committee for this report and note its recommendations and conclusions ... we received a large number of helpful responses to the consultation and as we have already indicated, our final proposals will reflect many of the concerns raised by respondents. Since the consultation closed, the LSC has been working closely with stakeholders including the Bar, Family Law Bar Association, Association of Lawyers for Children and the Law Society on proposals for the shape of the final scheme.
The LSC is proposing a new fixed fee scheme for advocacy work in private law and care proceedings. Legal aid minister, Lord Bach, has said the LSC’s response to the consultation will be announced before Parliament rises on 21 July.
A report by the Justice Select Committee, however, published on 15 July, has concluded the reforms were based on “incomplete data, [and] a superficial understanding of the supply of legal services in this area”. It criticised the LSC’s “conclusions first, evidence after” approach to policy-making, having commissioned Ernst and Young to gather data after it had proposed cuts to the system.
Desmond Browne QC, Chairman of the Bar, said: “This is a simply devastating condemnation of the LSC’s hapless efforts at reform.
“It shows that it is not practitioners who have pushed up the cost of legal aid. The Committee has confirmed our warning that there is a serious risk of an exodus of experienced practitioners from publicly-funded family law practice.”
Lucy Theis QC, chair of the Family Law Bar Association, said: “Surely now the LSC will wake up to reality: its plans for family legal aid are unwelcome, unworkable and unwanted. “On reading this report, Justice Ministers will realise that the LSC has failed a basic test of competence when it comes to delivering reform.”
A spokesperson for the LSC commented: “We are grateful to the Committee for this report and note its recommendations and conclusions ... we received a large number of helpful responses to the consultation and as we have already indicated, our final proposals will reflect many of the concerns raised by respondents. Since the consultation closed, the LSC has been working closely with stakeholders including the Bar, Family Law Bar Association, Association of Lawyers for Children and the Law Society on proposals for the shape of the final scheme.
A cross-party group of MPs has condemned the Legal Services Commission (“LSC”) proposals to cut legal aid funds for family law cases as “flawed, weak and inflexible”.
Kirsty Brimelow KC, Chair of the Bar, sets our course for 2026
What meaningful steps can you take in 2026 to advance your legal career? asks Thomas Cowan of St Pauls Chambers
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, explains why drugs may appear in test results, despite the donor denying use of them
Asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
AlphaBiolabs has donated £500 to The Christie Charity through its Giving Back initiative, helping to support cancer care, treatment and research across Greater Manchester, Cheshire and further afield
Q and A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today
With pupillage application season under way, Laura Wright reflects on her route to ‘tech barrister’ and offers advice for those aiming at a career at the Bar
Jury-less trial proposals threaten fairness, legitimacy and democracy without ending the backlog, writes Professor Cheryl Thomas KC (Hon), the UK’s leading expert on juries, judges and courts
Are you ready for the new way to do tax returns? David Southern KC explains the biggest change since HMRC launched self-assessment more than 30 years ago... and its impact on the Bar
Marking one year since a Bar disciplinary tribunal dismissed all charges against her, Dr Charlotte Proudman discusses the experience, her formative years and next steps. Interview by Anthony Inglese CB