*/
Most people would probably agree that establishing a mentoring scheme in chambers sounds like a good idea. There is no doubt that mentoring is a great way of giving something back, helping to address underrepresentation and inequalities in the profession, while improving chambers’ credentials as an inclusive, progressive and responsible organisation. It also makes chambers more attractive to applicants as they will get a sense that they will be supported through their career development.
But perhaps it also sounds like a lot of work for an already busy person to organise. And for that work to be worthwhile the scheme would need to be a success, rather than a tokenistic gesture. In my time as a barrister I certainly had ‘mentors’ who provided perhaps one coffee and one court visit – both beneficial in themselves but falling far short of what mentoring can offer.
However, there are a number of steps a chambers can take to make sure that their mentoring scheme is effective and provides demonstrable results.
First, you need to establish the purpose of the scheme including the definition of mentoring. People often have their own understanding of mentoring so it will undoubtedly help if both mentors and mentees share a view of what that will entail.
The definition I usually work with is that mentoring is a relationship (short- or long-term), usually between two people where:
If that definition is chosen, applicants to the scheme should also be encouraged to give some thought to whether it’s the right arrangement for them at that time, as opposed to say coaching or training. The prospective mentor should also reflect on whether they can really give the relationship the time, knowledge and experience needed.
Chambers will also want to consider whether the scheme is open to all or is designed for a specific group e.g. law students, returners to practice or those approaching an application for silk.
Finally, chambers will want to consider the broader structure of the scheme – how will confidentiality be managed, for example? Will there be somebody that mentors or mentees can turn to in the event of any problems?
Once these basic parameters are in place, you can turn to the matching of mentors and mentees.
Software is available and is used by larger organisations to match mentors and mentees. But, if you want to keep it simple, you can easily design an online form with a few key questions to allow prospective mentors and mentees to provide some basic information about the knowledge and experience of mentors and the goals of mentees. A neutral person can then carry out a matching exercise to put together suitable pairings.
In the world of coaching we use the word ‘contracting’ to mean agreeing the ground rules of the relationship at the outset to minimise any difficulties in the future. I recommend that the matched mentor and mentee agree their own arrangements at the outset around the parameters and boundaries they will respect including the following:
A significant factor in determining success or failure is how open the parties can be regarding their relationship. Honesty in communication throughout is vital. This can go a long way to preventing the mentoring relationship fading to an occasional chat.
Another key to successful mentoring is effective teaching. The mentee should be learning and, as both my own experience and various studies show, the mentor will also learn a lot and potentially even experience reduced stress levels.
Most people will recognise that learning tends to ‘stick’ more if the learner is involved rather than merely being lectured. So, for mentors to ensure that their mentees stay involved, I recommend the following approach:
This proverb sums up my passion for mentoring. A great mentor can save a keen mentee a lot of time and effort in achieving their goals by sharing some of their wisdom and providing support, encouragement and even introductions.
And, while a mentoring relationship might be for a specific task or time, in practical terms, if it’s a good quality one, and benefits both parties, it can last a lifetime and develop into a strong friendship.
Most people would probably agree that establishing a mentoring scheme in chambers sounds like a good idea. There is no doubt that mentoring is a great way of giving something back, helping to address underrepresentation and inequalities in the profession, while improving chambers’ credentials as an inclusive, progressive and responsible organisation. It also makes chambers more attractive to applicants as they will get a sense that they will be supported through their career development.
But perhaps it also sounds like a lot of work for an already busy person to organise. And for that work to be worthwhile the scheme would need to be a success, rather than a tokenistic gesture. In my time as a barrister I certainly had ‘mentors’ who provided perhaps one coffee and one court visit – both beneficial in themselves but falling far short of what mentoring can offer.
However, there are a number of steps a chambers can take to make sure that their mentoring scheme is effective and provides demonstrable results.
First, you need to establish the purpose of the scheme including the definition of mentoring. People often have their own understanding of mentoring so it will undoubtedly help if both mentors and mentees share a view of what that will entail.
The definition I usually work with is that mentoring is a relationship (short- or long-term), usually between two people where:
If that definition is chosen, applicants to the scheme should also be encouraged to give some thought to whether it’s the right arrangement for them at that time, as opposed to say coaching or training. The prospective mentor should also reflect on whether they can really give the relationship the time, knowledge and experience needed.
Chambers will also want to consider whether the scheme is open to all or is designed for a specific group e.g. law students, returners to practice or those approaching an application for silk.
Finally, chambers will want to consider the broader structure of the scheme – how will confidentiality be managed, for example? Will there be somebody that mentors or mentees can turn to in the event of any problems?
Once these basic parameters are in place, you can turn to the matching of mentors and mentees.
Software is available and is used by larger organisations to match mentors and mentees. But, if you want to keep it simple, you can easily design an online form with a few key questions to allow prospective mentors and mentees to provide some basic information about the knowledge and experience of mentors and the goals of mentees. A neutral person can then carry out a matching exercise to put together suitable pairings.
In the world of coaching we use the word ‘contracting’ to mean agreeing the ground rules of the relationship at the outset to minimise any difficulties in the future. I recommend that the matched mentor and mentee agree their own arrangements at the outset around the parameters and boundaries they will respect including the following:
A significant factor in determining success or failure is how open the parties can be regarding their relationship. Honesty in communication throughout is vital. This can go a long way to preventing the mentoring relationship fading to an occasional chat.
Another key to successful mentoring is effective teaching. The mentee should be learning and, as both my own experience and various studies show, the mentor will also learn a lot and potentially even experience reduced stress levels.
Most people will recognise that learning tends to ‘stick’ more if the learner is involved rather than merely being lectured. So, for mentors to ensure that their mentees stay involved, I recommend the following approach:
This proverb sums up my passion for mentoring. A great mentor can save a keen mentee a lot of time and effort in achieving their goals by sharing some of their wisdom and providing support, encouragement and even introductions.
And, while a mentoring relationship might be for a specific task or time, in practical terms, if it’s a good quality one, and benefits both parties, it can last a lifetime and develop into a strong friendship.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier