*/
Baroness Deech has called for a change in public attitude towards divorce.
In the first of six Gresham College lectures on family law, Divorce Law: A Disaster? , Baroness Deech of Cumnor DBE outlined the cost of divorce in financial and emotional terms, and called for a “new debate on marriage and the family under the umbrella of moral and civic renewal”, although she accepted that it was “unlikely to provide any consensus.” “
Divorce is not a private matter, it is of real public concern and cost, with a ripple effect on the family, the community and the whole country,” she said.
“So public attitudes have to be changed, just as they have been in relation to environmental issues and smoking, with greater or lesser success.”
She recommended that divorcing couples should be made to endure a 12 month waiting period in order to hold or reverse the rise in divorce.
“My own remedy would be an introduction of a waiting period to stop divorce being so quickly granted, even where the ground is one of the speedy ones,” she said.
“I would add to the present grounds of divorce a provision that no decree shall be granted until at least 12 months have elapsed from the service of the petition (the start of the formalities). This would ensure that no petitioner would be free to remarry for at least one year after the beginning of the process, regardless of the reasons for the divorce.”
Baroness Ruth Deech, who is professor of law at Gresham College and Chair of the Bar Standards Board, said that divorce often has a lasting impact on children, yet this is not taken seriously by politicians.
“It is astonishing that no government seriously considers divorce as an issue while expressing anxiety about single parents, their children and society’s health.”
Mediation had “not worked as well as might be hoped” and was unlikely to hold down the rate of divorce, she added.
“Women are reported to feel disadvantaged by mediation.
“This is because mediation seeks a compromise or agreement, and favours the articulate and determined over the cowed and quiet, apparently, and it is said female mediators are more persuaded by husbands’ arguments than wives’”.
She also said that women should “be educated to face [divorce], and it is no solution to the material and psychological problems to expect them all to rely on ex-husbands”.
Baroness Deech’s next speech will take place on 13 October.
Divorce is not a private matter, it is of real public concern and cost, with a ripple effect on the family, the community and the whole country,” she said.
“So public attitudes have to be changed, just as they have been in relation to environmental issues and smoking, with greater or lesser success.”
She recommended that divorcing couples should be made to endure a 12 month waiting period in order to hold or reverse the rise in divorce.
“My own remedy would be an introduction of a waiting period to stop divorce being so quickly granted, even where the ground is one of the speedy ones,” she said.
“I would add to the present grounds of divorce a provision that no decree shall be granted until at least 12 months have elapsed from the service of the petition (the start of the formalities). This would ensure that no petitioner would be free to remarry for at least one year after the beginning of the process, regardless of the reasons for the divorce.”
Baroness Ruth Deech, who is professor of law at Gresham College and Chair of the Bar Standards Board, said that divorce often has a lasting impact on children, yet this is not taken seriously by politicians.
“It is astonishing that no government seriously considers divorce as an issue while expressing anxiety about single parents, their children and society’s health.”
Mediation had “not worked as well as might be hoped” and was unlikely to hold down the rate of divorce, she added.
“Women are reported to feel disadvantaged by mediation.
“This is because mediation seeks a compromise or agreement, and favours the articulate and determined over the cowed and quiet, apparently, and it is said female mediators are more persuaded by husbands’ arguments than wives’”.
She also said that women should “be educated to face [divorce], and it is no solution to the material and psychological problems to expect them all to rely on ex-husbands”.
Baroness Deech’s next speech will take place on 13 October.
Baroness Deech has called for a change in public attitude towards divorce.
In the first of six Gresham College lectures on family law, Divorce Law: A Disaster?, Baroness Deech of Cumnor DBE outlined the cost of divorce in financial and emotional terms, and called for a “new debate on marriage and the family under the umbrella of moral and civic renewal”, although she accepted that it was “unlikely to provide any consensus.” “
Chair of the Bar reflects on 2025
AlphaBiolabs has donated £500 to The Christie Charity through its Giving Back initiative, helping to support cancer care, treatment and research across Greater Manchester, Cheshire and further afield
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
Revolt Cycling in Holborn, London’s first sustainable fitness studio, invites barristers to join the revolution – turning pedal power into clean energy
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, reflects on how the company’s Giving Back ethos continues to make a difference to communities across the UK
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
Are you ready for the new way to do tax returns? David Southern KC explains the biggest change since HMRC launched self-assessment more than 30 years ago... and its impact on the Bar
Professor Dominic Regan and Seán Jones KC present their best buys for this holiday season
Marking one year since a Bar disciplinary tribunal dismissed all charges against her, Dr Charlotte Proudman discusses the experience, her formative years and next steps. Interview by Anthony Inglese CB
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Pointillism, radical politics and social conscience. Review by Stephen Cragg KC