*/
Work is continuing on the Bar’s proposed self-funding civil justice scheme to “deal with nuts and bolts” ahead of Lord Justice Jackson’s final recommendations on litigation costs.
The Contingent Legal Aid Fund (“CLAF”) would be a self-financing pool of money used for civil claims where legal aid money was not available. Investors in the pool could see a return on their money.
Guy Mansfield QC, who is leading the group developing the CLAF, said they were looking at how it would be constructed in terms of legislation, how they would fund someone to run it, how they would manage costs, case selection criteria, and how much money would be needed up front. Mansfield emphasised the fund “should not be seen as a Trojan horse to take legal aid away from other cases” and would be an addition to, not a substitute for, legal aid funding.
However, the fund will not work if conditional fee arrangements (“CFAs”) continue in their present form. Lord Justice Jackson has hinted he may propose changes to the CFA regime when he delivers his recommendations, expected in December. In May 2009 Lord Justice Jackson published his preliminary report in his Review of Civil Litigation Costs. The report stated: “Following the retraction of legal aid, either CFAs or some other system of payment by results (contingent fee agreements, CLAF, SLAS, third party funding agreements etc) must exist in order to facilitate access to justice.”
The Contingent Legal Aid Fund (“CLAF”) would be a self-financing pool of money used for civil claims where legal aid money was not available. Investors in the pool could see a return on their money.
Guy Mansfield QC, who is leading the group developing the CLAF, said they were looking at how it would be constructed in terms of legislation, how they would fund someone to run it, how they would manage costs, case selection criteria, and how much money would be needed up front. Mansfield emphasised the fund “should not be seen as a Trojan horse to take legal aid away from other cases” and would be an addition to, not a substitute for, legal aid funding.
However, the fund will not work if conditional fee arrangements (“CFAs”) continue in their present form. Lord Justice Jackson has hinted he may propose changes to the CFA regime when he delivers his recommendations, expected in December. In May 2009 Lord Justice Jackson published his preliminary report in his Review of Civil Litigation Costs. The report stated: “Following the retraction of legal aid, either CFAs or some other system of payment by results (contingent fee agreements, CLAF, SLAS, third party funding agreements etc) must exist in order to facilitate access to justice.”
Work is continuing on the Bar’s proposed self-funding civil justice scheme to “deal with nuts and bolts” ahead of Lord Justice Jackson’s final recommendations on litigation costs.
Justice system requires urgent attention and next steps on the Harman Review
Q&A with Tim Lynch of Jordan Lynch Private Finance
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Why Virtual Assistants Can Meet the Legal Profession’s Exacting Standards
Despite increased awareness, why are AI hallucinations continuing to infiltrate court cases at an alarming rate? Matthew Lee investigates
Many disabled barristers face entrenched obstacles to KC appointment – both procedural and systemic, writes Diego F Soto-Miranda
The proscribing of Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act is an assault on the English language and on civil liberties, argues Paul Harris SC, founder of the Bar Human Rights Committee
For over three decades, the Bar Mock Trial Competition has boosted the skills, knowledge and confidence of tens of thousands of state school students – as sixth-form teacher Conor Duffy and Young Citizens’ Akasa Pradhan report
Suzie Miller’s latest play puts the legal system centre stage once more. Will it galvanise change? asks Rehna Azim
