*/
Every set of barristers’ chambers would need to gather and publish statistics on the diversity of their members and staff, under new Legal Services Board (“LSB”) proposals.
Barristers, clerks and all chambers’ employees would be asked questions relevant to the new public sector equality duty – age, race, disability, religion or belief, gender reassignment, sex, pregnancy and maternity and sexual orientation – plus socio-economic background.
Participation would be voluntary and anonymous. Chambers would be required to publish the results and report it to the Bar Standards Board, even where there is no response or the response is “prefer not to say”.
The new duty would apply to all regulated legal services providers.
The LSB believes publishing the results will create competitive pressure among chambers and other providers to take action to increase diversity, and give regulators a clearer picture of levels of diversity and the success or otherwise of diversity initiatives such as the Bar Council’s mentoring and outreach programmes.
LSB Chairman, David Edmonds, said: “Through these measures there will be greater transparency and sharper scrutiny by regulators and consumers based on published data.
“Appropriate policies can then be developed on the basis of the evidence we collect.”
The consultation, “Increasing diversity and social mobility in the legal workforce: transparency and evidence”, closes on 9 March 2011.
Barristers, clerks and all chambers’ employees would be asked questions relevant to the new public sector equality duty – age, race, disability, religion or belief, gender reassignment, sex, pregnancy and maternity and sexual orientation – plus socio-economic background.
Participation would be voluntary and anonymous. Chambers would be required to publish the results and report it to the Bar Standards Board, even where there is no response or the response is “prefer not to say”.
The new duty would apply to all regulated legal services providers.
The LSB believes publishing the results will create competitive pressure among chambers and other providers to take action to increase diversity, and give regulators a clearer picture of levels of diversity and the success or otherwise of diversity initiatives such as the Bar Council’s mentoring and outreach programmes.
LSB Chairman, David Edmonds, said: “Through these measures there will be greater transparency and sharper scrutiny by regulators and consumers based on published data.
“Appropriate policies can then be developed on the basis of the evidence we collect.”
The consultation, “Increasing diversity and social mobility in the legal workforce: transparency and evidence”, closes on 9 March 2011.
Every set of barristers’ chambers would need to gather and publish statistics on the diversity of their members and staff, under new Legal Services Board (“LSB”) proposals.
Justice system requires urgent attention and next steps on the Harman Review
Q&A with Tim Lynch of Jordan Lynch Private Finance
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Why Virtual Assistants Can Meet the Legal Profession’s Exacting Standards
Despite increased awareness, why are AI hallucinations continuing to infiltrate court cases at an alarming rate? Matthew Lee investigates
Many disabled barristers face entrenched obstacles to KC appointment – both procedural and systemic, writes Diego F Soto-Miranda
The proscribing of Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act is an assault on the English language and on civil liberties, argues Paul Harris SC, founder of the Bar Human Rights Committee
For over three decades, the Bar Mock Trial Competition has boosted the skills, knowledge and confidence of tens of thousands of state school students – as sixth-form teacher Conor Duffy and Young Citizens’ Akasa Pradhan report
Suzie Miller’s latest play puts the legal system centre stage once more. Will it galvanise change? asks Rehna Azim
