*/
The Role of the Circuit Courts in the Formation of United States Law in the Early Republic
Author: His Honour David Lynch
Publisher: Hart Publishing (2018)
ISBN: 9781509910854
All proceeds are donated to the Bar Benevolent Fund
The author of this scholarly work requires little by way of introduction. A Bencher of Middle Temple and Honorary Fellow and Visiting Research Fellow of Liverpool John Moores University, he has been the Remembrancer for the Northern Circuit for many years and as such compiled his Northern Circuit Directory (1876-2004) which he updated in 2015.
This current work deals with a vitally important period of US legal history and the crucial role of the circuit courts in the development of a uniform system of federal law across the nation. By reference to the judgments, opinions and letters of four Associate Justices (Washington, Livingston, Story and Thompson) as presiding judges of their respective circuit courts in the period 1801-1835 and with separate sections of his work devoted to the work of each of them, the author demonstrates how federal law developed from the lower courts upwards rather than from the Supreme Court downwards.
The justices went out on circuit with no specific guidance as to the approach they should adopt to achieve the uniform system of federal law and procedure essential to the stability of the social and economic needs of the new Republic. There were few Supreme Court opinions and hardly any federal statutes to guide them. They sought uniformity in each other’s circuit opinions and those opinions were often derived from Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England. Consistency was achieved by exchanges of ideas when they were together in Washington and by writing to each other on circuit.
This laudable and detailed investigation into the work of the four prominent justices of the United States circuit courts establishes those courts as key to the development of the federal court system in the Early Republic and how the law was shaped in those early years through the depth of its inquiry into the legal issues facing the justices on circuit.
Based upon his research the author concludes that by 1835 these four justices had found American law a skeleton upon which to build and their work in the federal courts at the very beginning of the federal court experiment and later in their duties in the Supreme Court left a fully formed body of federal law to which later generations have added.
As a guide to a critical period of US history, legal as well as economic and political, I commend this book as compulsory reading.
Reviewer: David Steer QC DL, Leader of the Northern Circuit 2002-04
The author of this scholarly work requires little by way of introduction. A Bencher of Middle Temple and Honorary Fellow and Visiting Research Fellow of Liverpool John Moores University, he has been the Remembrancer for the Northern Circuit for many years and as such compiled his Northern Circuit Directory (1876-2004) which he updated in 2015.
This current work deals with a vitally important period of US legal history and the crucial role of the circuit courts in the development of a uniform system of federal law across the nation. By reference to the judgments, opinions and letters of four Associate Justices (Washington, Livingston, Story and Thompson) as presiding judges of their respective circuit courts in the period 1801-1835 and with separate sections of his work devoted to the work of each of them, the author demonstrates how federal law developed from the lower courts upwards rather than from the Supreme Court downwards.
The justices went out on circuit with no specific guidance as to the approach they should adopt to achieve the uniform system of federal law and procedure essential to the stability of the social and economic needs of the new Republic. There were few Supreme Court opinions and hardly any federal statutes to guide them. They sought uniformity in each other’s circuit opinions and those opinions were often derived from Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England. Consistency was achieved by exchanges of ideas when they were together in Washington and by writing to each other on circuit.
This laudable and detailed investigation into the work of the four prominent justices of the United States circuit courts establishes those courts as key to the development of the federal court system in the Early Republic and how the law was shaped in those early years through the depth of its inquiry into the legal issues facing the justices on circuit.
Based upon his research the author concludes that by 1835 these four justices had found American law a skeleton upon which to build and their work in the federal courts at the very beginning of the federal court experiment and later in their duties in the Supreme Court left a fully formed body of federal law to which later generations have added.
As a guide to a critical period of US history, legal as well as economic and political, I commend this book as compulsory reading.
Reviewer: David Steer QC DL, Leader of the Northern Circuit 2002-04
The Role of the Circuit Courts in the Formation of United States Law in the Early Republic
Author: His Honour David Lynch
Publisher: Hart Publishing (2018)
ISBN: 9781509910854
All proceeds are donated to the Bar Benevolent Fund
Chair of the Bar finds common ground on legal services between our two jurisdictions, plus an update on jury trials
A £500 donation from AlphaBiolabs has been made to the leading UK charity tackling international parental child abduction and the movement of children across international borders
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, outlines the drug and alcohol testing options available for family law professionals, and how a new, free guide can help identify the most appropriate testing method for each specific case
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, examines the latest ONS data on drug misuse and its implications for toxicology testing in family law cases
An interview with Rob Wagg, CEO of New Park Court Chambers
With at least 31 reports of AI hallucinations in UK legal cases – over 800 worldwide – and judges using AI to assist in judicial decision-making, the risks and benefits are impossible to ignore. Matthew Lee examines how different jurisdictions are responding
What has changed, and why? Paul Secher unpacks the new standards aligning the recruiting, training and appraising of judges – the first major change to the system for ten years
The deprivation of liberty is the most significant power the state can exercise. Drawing on frontline experience, Chris Henley KC explains why replacing trial by jury with judge-only trials risks undermining justice
Ever wondered what a pupillage is like at the CPS? This Q and A provides an insight into the training, experience and next steps
The appointments of 96 new King’s Counsel (also known as silk) are announced today