*/
The Bar Council has unanimously approved plans to give the Bar Standards Board (“BSB”) its own constitution, in a move which enshrines its independence.
As of 30 April, the BSB will have powers to appoint committees and approve standing orders and rules that govern its structure and operation. The move makes the Bar Council the first legal professional body to implement the separation of regulatory and representative powers, as required by the Legal Services Act 2007.
Nick Green QC, Chairman of the Bar, said: “I am very pleased with this outcome and enormously grateful to the members of the Working Party for helping us to achieve this result.” BSB board members have also approved the plans. Legal regulators have until the end of April to satisfy the Legal Services Board (“LSB”) that they have ensured sufficient independence from the representative arms of their professional bodies. Regulatory independence is a requirement on all approved regulators, under the LSB’s internal governance rules. The BSB aims to have a lay majority on its board by 2012, and will achieve this on an incremental basis by appointing laypersons when barrister members complete their three-year terms of office.
Baroness Deech, Chairman of the BSB, said: “The agreement by the Bar Council to a separate constitution is a significant development in the evolution of the Bar. “It marks an acceptance throughout the profession that regulation is necessary and should be close to the profession though independent from it. This step demonstrates the Bar Council’s understanding of the important role the regulatory arm is playing in the future of the Bar. “The creation of the new constitutional position reflects a good working relationship between the Bar Council and BSB with independence and cooperation at appropriate levels. Tribute must be paid to the current and past Chairmen of the Bar who have overseen the emergence of the regulatory arm: Stephen Hockman QC, The Hon Mr Justice Vos QC, Timothy Dutton QC, Desmond Browne QC and the current Bar Chairman, Nick Green QC.”
Nick Green QC, Chairman of the Bar, said: “I am very pleased with this outcome and enormously grateful to the members of the Working Party for helping us to achieve this result.” BSB board members have also approved the plans. Legal regulators have until the end of April to satisfy the Legal Services Board (“LSB”) that they have ensured sufficient independence from the representative arms of their professional bodies. Regulatory independence is a requirement on all approved regulators, under the LSB’s internal governance rules. The BSB aims to have a lay majority on its board by 2012, and will achieve this on an incremental basis by appointing laypersons when barrister members complete their three-year terms of office.
Baroness Deech, Chairman of the BSB, said: “The agreement by the Bar Council to a separate constitution is a significant development in the evolution of the Bar. “It marks an acceptance throughout the profession that regulation is necessary and should be close to the profession though independent from it. This step demonstrates the Bar Council’s understanding of the important role the regulatory arm is playing in the future of the Bar. “The creation of the new constitutional position reflects a good working relationship between the Bar Council and BSB with independence and cooperation at appropriate levels. Tribute must be paid to the current and past Chairmen of the Bar who have overseen the emergence of the regulatory arm: Stephen Hockman QC, The Hon Mr Justice Vos QC, Timothy Dutton QC, Desmond Browne QC and the current Bar Chairman, Nick Green QC.”
The Bar Council has unanimously approved plans to give the Bar Standards Board (“BSB”) its own constitution, in a move which enshrines its independence.
As of 30 April, the BSB will have powers to appoint committees and approve standing orders and rules that govern its structure and operation. The move makes the Bar Council the first legal professional body to implement the separation of regulatory and representative powers, as required by the Legal Services Act 2007.
Justice system requires urgent attention and next steps on the Harman Review
Q&A with Tim Lynch of Jordan Lynch Private Finance
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Why Virtual Assistants Can Meet the Legal Profession’s Exacting Standards
Despite increased awareness, why are AI hallucinations continuing to infiltrate court cases at an alarming rate? Matthew Lee investigates
Many disabled barristers face entrenched obstacles to KC appointment – both procedural and systemic, writes Diego F Soto-Miranda
The proscribing of Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act is an assault on the English language and on civil liberties, argues Paul Harris SC, founder of the Bar Human Rights Committee
For over three decades, the Bar Mock Trial Competition has boosted the skills, knowledge and confidence of tens of thousands of state school students – as sixth-form teacher Conor Duffy and Young Citizens’ Akasa Pradhan report
Suzie Miller’s latest play puts the legal system centre stage once more. Will it galvanise change? asks Rehna Azim
