*/
THE Bar Council has welcomed the Ministry of Justice’s decision to create a new executive agency to replace the Legal Services Commission (LSC) to administer legal aid. The Government’s announcement follows the publication of the Review of Legal Aid Delivery and Governance by Sir Ian Magee, which had been commissioned by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), and a highly critical report of the Public Accounts Committee published in February (9th Report, HC 322) which accepted the findings of a review of the procurement of criminal legal aid by the National Audit Office in 2009.
Commenting on the Government’s decision, Chairman of the Bar, Nicholas Green QC said:
‘We welcome the publication of Sir Ian Magee’s report and the decision to move the Legal Services Commission to executive agency status in order to focus on the delivery of legal aid. Sir Ian’s report is thoughtful and well argued. As Sir Ian recognises, there has been a lack of clarity about who is calling the shots over policy. He identifies a number of serious issues which we will need to consider further. The case for separating the roles of administration of the legal aid funds from policy formulation, and clarifying the relationship between the MoJ and the LSC in organisational and governance terms, is a strong one which will undoubtedly help to rebuild more constructive relationships with the supplier base and stakeholders.
At a time of enormous pressure on public expenditure, it is essential that the LSC focuses on effective delivery of legal aidwhich demonstrates value for money to the taxpayer but also at the same time ensures access to justice for those who need it most. We shall look forward to beginning early discussions with MoJ officials to explore how the Bar could help the Ministry take forward the Magee recommendations for change. We shall also look forward to working with Carolyn Downs as interim Chief Executive of the Legal Services Commission.’
Commenting on the Government’s decision, Chairman of the Bar, Nicholas Green QC said:
‘We welcome the publication of Sir Ian Magee’s report and the decision to move the Legal Services Commission to executive agency status in order to focus on the delivery of legal aid. Sir Ian’s report is thoughtful and well argued. As Sir Ian recognises, there has been a lack of clarity about who is calling the shots over policy. He identifies a number of serious issues which we will need to consider further. The case for separating the roles of administration of the legal aid funds from policy formulation, and clarifying the relationship between the MoJ and the LSC in organisational and governance terms, is a strong one which will undoubtedly help to rebuild more constructive relationships with the supplier base and stakeholders.
At a time of enormous pressure on public expenditure, it is essential that the LSC focuses on effective delivery of legal aidwhich demonstrates value for money to the taxpayer but also at the same time ensures access to justice for those who need it most. We shall look forward to beginning early discussions with MoJ officials to explore how the Bar could help the Ministry take forward the Magee recommendations for change. We shall also look forward to working with Carolyn Downs as interim Chief Executive of the Legal Services Commission.’
THE Bar Council has welcomed the Ministry of Justice’s decision to create a new executive agency to replace the Legal Services Commission (LSC) to administer legal aid. The Government’s announcement follows the publication of the Review of Legal Aid Delivery and Governance by Sir Ian Magee, which had been commissioned by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), and a highly critical report of the Public Accounts Committee published in February (9th Report, HC 322) which accepted the findings of a review of the procurement of criminal legal aid by the National Audit Office in 2009.
Justice system requires urgent attention and next steps on the Harman Review
Q&A with Tim Lynch of Jordan Lynch Private Finance
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Why Virtual Assistants Can Meet the Legal Profession’s Exacting Standards
Despite increased awareness, why are AI hallucinations continuing to infiltrate court cases at an alarming rate? Matthew Lee investigates
Many disabled barristers face entrenched obstacles to KC appointment – both procedural and systemic, writes Diego F Soto-Miranda
The proscribing of Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act is an assault on the English language and on civil liberties, argues Paul Harris SC, founder of the Bar Human Rights Committee
For over three decades, the Bar Mock Trial Competition has boosted the skills, knowledge and confidence of tens of thousands of state school students – as sixth-form teacher Conor Duffy and Young Citizens’ Akasa Pradhan report
Suzie Miller’s latest play puts the legal system centre stage once more. Will it galvanise change? asks Rehna Azim
