*/
Solicitors should explain their reasons for recommending a particular advocate and sign a declaration that they have explained the choices available to their lay client, the Bar Council has said.
Responding to the Ministry of Justice’s consultation Preserving and Enhancing the Quality of Criminal Advocacy, the Bar backed plans for a referral fee ban and urged the Government to outlaw all inducements. The only consideration, it said, should be the quality of the advocate.
It also called for a Solicitor Regulation Authority-style reporting service through which advocates and others could confidentially report referral fee breaches.
Former Bar Chairman, Alistair MacDonald QC, said: ‘It is a matter of principle that public funds provided to pay for advocacy services should not be used to pay for kickbacks.’
The Bar Council supported the Government’s proposal for a criminal defence advocacy panel, loosely based on the Crown Prosecution Service model, so long as safeguards are put in place to ensure it operates effectively and is independent of government.
It also backed calls for solicitors to sign a declaration confirming that clients have been fully informed about the choice of advocate available to them, and suggested that solicitors provide a ‘brief explanation’ of why the type of advocate has been recommended and obtain signed confirmation that their clients have been advised of their right to choose, in plain and clear language.
MacDonald said: ‘Any declaration must require a litigator’s signature. There are serious contractual and professional consequences if a litigator is found to have lied on a signed declaration. This can’t be a tick box exercise.’
However, the Bar Council did not support the proposal to prevent solicitors from instructing advocates employed in their own firms, so long as they were the best person available to conduct the advocacy in a particular case – a proposal that the Law Society also slammed.
Solicitors should explain their reasons for recommending a particular advocate and sign a declaration that they have explained the choices available to their lay client, the Bar Council has said.
Responding to the Ministry of Justice’s consultation Preserving and Enhancing the Quality of Criminal Advocacy, the Bar backed plans for a referral fee ban and urged the Government to outlaw all inducements. The only consideration, it said, should be the quality of the advocate.
It also called for a Solicitor Regulation Authority-style reporting service through which advocates and others could confidentially report referral fee breaches.
Former Bar Chairman, Alistair MacDonald QC, said: ‘It is a matter of principle that public funds provided to pay for advocacy services should not be used to pay for kickbacks.’
The Bar Council supported the Government’s proposal for a criminal defence advocacy panel, loosely based on the Crown Prosecution Service model, so long as safeguards are put in place to ensure it operates effectively and is independent of government.
It also backed calls for solicitors to sign a declaration confirming that clients have been fully informed about the choice of advocate available to them, and suggested that solicitors provide a ‘brief explanation’ of why the type of advocate has been recommended and obtain signed confirmation that their clients have been advised of their right to choose, in plain and clear language.
MacDonald said: ‘Any declaration must require a litigator’s signature. There are serious contractual and professional consequences if a litigator is found to have lied on a signed declaration. This can’t be a tick box exercise.’
However, the Bar Council did not support the proposal to prevent solicitors from instructing advocates employed in their own firms, so long as they were the best person available to conduct the advocacy in a particular case – a proposal that the Law Society also slammed.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier
